Skip to main content

Tag: Holmes Beach planning commission

Commissioners discuss ‘green building’ incentives

HOLMES BEACH – Planning commissioners and Development Services Director Chad Minor recently discussed what, if anything, might be done to encourage “green building” in Holmes Beach.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Green building is the practice of creating structures and using processes that are environmentally responsible and resource-efficient through­out a building’s life cycle. Green building is also known as a sustainable or high performance building.”

On May 29, Minor sent planning commissioners a memo that included proposed, staff-initiated land development code text amendments that would help implement Objective 1.8 in the city’s comprehensive plan, which says, “The city shall encourage energy efficiency and sustainability in building design, construc­tion and renovation.”

Working in unison, the comp plan establishes the city’s long-term vision for development and redevelopment and the land development code contains the specific codes that regulate development.

Commissioners discuss ‘green building’ incentives
The U.S. Green Building Council promotes and supports green building practices. – USGBC | Submitted

According to Minor’s memo, green building practices are generally consistent with techniques used to achieve third-party certification from entities like the U.S. Green Building Council Leadership in En­ergy and Environmental Design (LEED), the Florida Green Building Coalition and the Green Lodging program.

On June 4, Minor and the planning commission discussed how the city might incentivize green building, which is much more expensive than standard construction.

“I haven’t seen a lot of it on the Island,” Minor said. “I can’t think of a single LEED-certified or U.S. Green Building-certified green building on the Island.”

The Historic Green Village on Pine Avenue in Anna Maria was awarded Platinum LEED Certification in 2012.

Minor said the city’s incentive options are limited.

“We can’t offer building height incen­tives,” he said of the height restrictions contained in the city charter.

Minor said the city could waive building permit fees, expedite the permitting process and increase the maximum lot coverage from 30% to 40% for green building projects.

“You’re letting them have a larger building,” he said.

“I really have a problem with this,” Plan­ning Commissioner Gale Tedhams said.

“I do too,” Commissioner Lisa Pierce said.

Tedhams said green buildings don’t get certified until the construction process is completed and additional certification and verification requirements are met. She said a structure built with additional lot coverage would remain standing even if the green building certification standards are never met.

“It’s not in line with what we’re trying to do,” she said.

“That’s why we have these discussions,” Minor said.

Pierce expressed concerns about in­creased lot coverage allowances decreasing the setback distance between neighboring homes and increasing the fire hazards.

Pierce supports “true green build­ings” but she’s concerned that some developers would take advantage of the incentives without fully meeting the certification requirements. Tedhams shared that concern.

Pierce wondered if a tax incentive could be given and Tedhams said Sarasota County gives rebates for completed green building projects.

Tedhams noted the Hunters Point community in Cortez is being developed as a LEED-certified community and there’s also a lot of green building occurring in Lakewood Ranch. She suggested inviting a green builder and/or a green certification verifier to share their insights with the planning commission.

During public input, City Commissioner Carol Soustek reminded Minor and the planning commissioners that revenues lost from waiving or reducing permit fees may have to offset elsewhere in the city budget.

The discussion produced no formal recommendations and the proposed text amendments are expected to be discussed at a future city commission work session.

Steve Oelfke joins Holmes Beach Commission

Steve Oelfke joins Holmes Beach Commission

HOLMES BEACH – Former city commission candidate and planning commissioner Steve Oelfke has been appointed to fill the remainder of Pat Morton’s two-year term that expires in November.

After 22 years in office, Morton announced his resignation during the city commission’s Feb. 11 work session. During the brief discus­sion that ensued after Morton’s announcement, the mayor, city attorney and city commissioners discussed appointing Oelfke to serve the remainder of Morton’s term – in part because Oelfke received the third highest number of votes in the 2024 election that resulted in Dan Diggins being elected to serve another term and Carol Whitmore being elected to rejoin the city commission after a long stint as a county commissioner.

The four remaining commissioners expressed their unanimous support for Oelfke but the appointment could not be made during a commission work session.

During the Feb. 25 city commission meeting, Whitmore nominated Oelfke to fill the vacancy. Commissioner Terry Schaefer seconded the motion and Diggins and Commissioner Carol Soustek supported the nomination with no other nominees.

“Welcome Steve,” Diggins said.

Before City Clerk Stacey Johnston swore Oelfke in as a city commis­sioner, City Attorney Erica Augello said he had to first resign from the planning commission.

“As much as I hate to leave the planning commission, I will have to relinquish my position,” Oelfke said.

After being sworn in, Oelfke took his seat on the commission dais and signed some required documents.

Steve Oelfke joins Holmes Beach Commission
Steve Oelfke is now a Holmes Beach city commissioner. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

After congratulating Oelfke, Schaefer said, “You served the city very well on the planning commission and I can’t think of a better proving ground. After the election, you never lost interest in the city. You were here, I believe, every (city commission) meeting, paying attention and observing. I think that’s a tribute to your sincere effort to serve our city.”

“I think we all concur on that,” Diggins added.

Speaking for the first time as a city commissioner, Oelfke said, “It’s just an honor to be here with you all and I look forward to being able to contrib­ute and help make the city great.”

He then participated in the rest of the meeting.

Planning commission vacancy

Oelfke’s appointment to the city commission creates a vacancy on the planning commission, which meets the first Wednesday of the month at 3:30 p.m. Planning commissioners review land use ordinances and issues and make non-binding recommendations to the city commission.

The city is currently accepting applications for the open position on the planning commission. Applicants must be qualified electors (voters) of Holmes Beach and must have lived in the city for a minimum of two years.

Applications should be submit­ted to the city clerk’s office no later than Wednesday, March 19. Applications are available at the city’s website and those interested can also contact Johnston at cityclerk@holmesbeachfl.org or by calling 941-708-5800, ext. 226.

Related coverage: Morton resigns from Holmes Beach commission

Planning commission will not review site plans

Planning commission will not review site plans

HOLMES BEACH – At the advice of City Attorney Erica Augello, city commissioners plan to deny the plan­ning commission’s request to conduct preliminary reviews of major site plan applications.

Augello also advised that major site plan applications not be preliminarily discussed during non-quasi-judicial city commission work meetings.

A site plan is a diagram that il­lustrates a proposed development, redevelopment or significant improve­ments desired by a property owner.

Augello dispensed her legal advice on Jan. 14 while Holmes Beach city commissioners and Director of Devel­opment Services Chad Minor discussed proposed changes to the city’s site plan application review processes. The proposed changes are set forth in Ordinance 25-02 and the ordinance was presented on first reading that day. Adoption is expected during the second and final reading on Tuesday, Jan. 28.

Currently, the planning commission does not review major site plan ap­plications before the city commission conducts an evidence- and testimony-based quasi-judicial public hearing on the proposed site plan.

When initially reviewing the proposed ordinance last year, the planning commissioners recom­mended inserting additional language that would allow them conduct public hearings to review major site plan applications for consistency with the city’s comprehensive plan and land development code. This would be done before the city commission conducts its quasi-judicial public hearing on the site plan application.

The planning commission’s recommended language was included in the ordinance presented to city commissioners on Jan. 14.

“The city planning commission shall hold a properly noticed public hearing to review the site plan application and based on the evidence presented provide a recommendation to the board of commissioners as to whether the application is consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan and land development code.

“The city planning commission may also provide advisory comments to the applicant regarding site design recommendations to increase compatibility of the site with adjacent uses and the surrounding area. After review by the planning commission, the planning and zoning administrator or designee shall prepare a staff report, findings and recommendation for submittal to the city commission for review at a public hearing, including any recommendations provided by the planning commission,” the ordinance said at that time.

Regarding the proposed inclusion of the planning commission in the site plan application review process, City Commissioner Carol Whitmore said, “I don’t support this. This is not a planning commission role. This is one of the biggest jobs of the commission and we should be taking the responsibility for it.”

Whitmore said the planning com­mission’s role is to ensure compliance with the city’s comprehensive plan and allowing them to conduct public hearings to review site plan applications would subject the city to additional attorney fees.

“I respect the planning commission and I love what they do, but this is our job and I don’t feel like giving my job up to another board,” Whitmore said.

Planning commission will not review site plans
City Attorney Erica Augello advised against the planning commission reviewing major site plans. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Augello noted the planning com­mission is an advisory board, not a decision-making body. When conduct­ing a quasi-judicial public hearing, the city commission could not use any evidence or testimony given at a planning commission hearing.

Augello agreed that a planning commission hearing would provide another layer of public input but it could also create additional legal complications if the city commission denies a site plan application and the applicant appeals the decision. Augello said the applicant could allege the city commission made its decision based on the planning commission review rather than the evidence and testimony presented directly to the city commission.

Augello said planning commission review of a site plan application could also create a “conflict in record evi­dence.” If something was presented at the planning commission hearing and not at the city commission hearing, that could create a potential deviation of information. Augello advised avoiding a “dual review” process for site plan applications and she sug­gested a similar approach for rezoning requests.

Commissioner Carol Soustek serves as the city commission’s planning commission liaison. She expressed her respect for the planning commis­sion and their desire to review site plans but she agrees with Whitmore regarding the avoidance of additional attorney fees.

Commissioner Terry Schaefer noted subjecting site plan applications to a single public hearing provides the public with only one opportunity to provide their input.

The commission unanimously agreed to remove the planning com­mission’s recommended language and move forward toward final adoption of the ordinance as amended that day.

In a related action meant to solicit greater input from the city’s advisory boards, the commission agreed to place monthly advisory board reports on future commission meeting agendas.

After the city commission meeting, Minor sent a revision version of the ordinance to City Clerk Stacey Johnston, with the planning commission’s recommended language deleted.

Planning Commission Response

On Jan. 15, when reviewing the ordinance as amended the previous day, the planning commissioners expressed disappointment with the city commission’s decision, but they acknowledged the city attorney’s legal concerns. After much discussion, the planning commissioners unanimously agreed to reinsert the deleted lan­guage as a symbolic reiteration of their desire for greater transparency in the site plan review process – knowing the city commission will delete that language again before the ordinance is adopted on second reading.

Minor said he would never present a site plan application to the city commission that doesn’t comply with the city’s comprehensive plan and land development code. At the request of the planning commission, Minor agreed to post a notice at the city website when a major site plan ap­plication is received so the public has as much advance notice as possible.

Minor course changes possible for city dock provisions

Minor course changes possible for city dock provisions

HOLMES BEACH – The Holmes Beach Planning Commission met on Dec. 4 for the first time since August, with all five members and both alternate members present.

The planning commission consists of Chairperson Gale Tedhams, Vice-Chair Jim McIntire, Lisa Pierce, Steven Oelfke and Richard Brown, with Joseph Ireland serving as the first alternate and James Harrison serving as the second alternate. Tedhams welcomed the members back and expressed her hope that everyone successfully weathered hurricanes Helene and Milton.

Minor course changes possible for city dock provisions
Gale Tedhams chairs the Holmes Beach Planning Commission. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Development Services Director Chad Minor and City Clerk Stacey Johnston also participated in the meeting. Minor and the commission members continued their previous discussion on amending the dock provisions contained in the city’s municipal code.

DOCK PROVISIONS

Minor proposes adding definitions for the terms “boathouse,” “dock,” “finger dock,” “watercraft,” “mooring area” and “mean high water line,” which he said are mentioned but not defined in the current municipal code.

Minor does not propose changing the existing setback requirements for docks or the distance a dock can extend into the water.

“Everyone seems to be following the mooring rules pretty well,” he said.

Minor referenced the individually-platted mooring areas located on individually-platted submerged lots in various canals throughout the city. The meeting packet included aerial photographs of the 85th Street Canal, the T-end canal between Baronet and Concord lanes on Key Royale, the Marina Court Canal, the 83rd Street Canal, the 77th Street Canal and the 68th Street and 69th Street canals.

Minor said ownership of these individually-platted mooring areas does not necessarily coin­cide with the nearest residential structure and the existing city code doesn’t address these areas, most of which already contain docks.

He said the individually-platted mooring areas are generally about 10 feet wide and about 25 feet long.

“Under our current code, which doesn’t address these, it would be impossible for a 10-foot-wide slip to accommodate a 10-foot setback,” he noted.

Minor said a building permit would be required to install a new dock or lift in one of the individually-platted mooring areas and he proposed that no part of the installation, including the watercraft, extend more than 25 feet into the waterway, as measured from the seawall, or extend beyond the lot lines of the adjacent parcels or boat slips.

Minor said the city clerk wanted to make some com­ments about tweaking the existing code as it pertains to the city-owned boat slips administered by city staff. Johnston said the existing code requires too many steps for evicting a lessee from a city-owned dock space. She also feels the 60-day application period for those on the waiting list results in a city-owned slip sitting vacant for too long.

Minor course changes possible for city dock provisions
The city of Holmes Beach owns several canal-side boat slips. – Google Maps | Submitted
Minor course changes possiblefor city dock provisions
The city leases out the city-owned boat slips in the Sunrise Boat Basin. – Google Maps | Submitted

According to the city website, Holmes Beach residents can rent city-owned boat slips in the following locations: Marina Drive T-ends located between 72nd and 77th streets and the Sunrise Boat Basin located at 28th Street and Avenue B. The an­nual fee is $600 at the Marina Drive T-ends and the fee at the Sunrise Boat Basin is $425.

“Right now, we do not have any open spots for both locations,” the city website notes.

Minor said he would incorporate the changes discussed that evening into the proposed provisions to be reviewed again at the planning commission’s Jan. 15 meeting. Minor also hopes to present the planning commission members with some proposed seawall provisions.

MEETING TIMES

Included in the meeting packet was a memo from Johnston regarding City Commissioner Carol Soustek’s request to start the monthly planning commission meetings at 2 p.m. rather than 5 p.m.

Johnston’s memo noted most city meetings now take place during the day, when city staff is available during normal business hours.

Tedhams noted some planning commission members still hold regular day jobs. Pierce said her work schedule would prevent her from attending 2 p.m. meetings. Oelfke said he leaves work early to attend the 5 p.m. meetings but he could adjust his work schedule to accommodate a 3:30 p.m. start time. The commission agreed to start their Jan. 15 meeting at 3:30 p.m.

Public hearing planned for comp plan changes

HOLMES BEACH – It’s taken about 18 months for the Planning Commission to finish its review and revisions of the city’s comprehensive plan, and now city commissioners are ready to discuss those changes at a public hearing.

During a Feb. 22 work session, city commissioners reviewed the changes to the comprehensive plan submitted by planning commissioners along with representatives from LaRue Planning, who assisted in the audit.

Some of the biggest proposed changes include the addition of a property rights element and the incorporation of arts and culture as a part of the recreation element. Each element of the comprehensive plan was also amended to make it easier to understand and to incorporate the city’s vision and value statements.

City commissioners praised everyone who worked on the revisions.

“A lot of people worked very hard on this. It took a lot of time,” Commissioner Carol Soustek said. “I think it’s about as good as it can get. It’s so clean now,” she said of the comprehensive plan.

As a part of the comprehensive plan review, planning commissioners held several public meetings along with a workshop to go over the proposed changes and get public input.

Now the amended comprehensive plan will go before city commissioners for a public hearing and a vote at the Tuesday, March 8 meeting before being submitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for review. If the changes pass the city commission’s first vote, they must be submitted to the DEO within 10 days, after which that organization has 30 days to review and provide comments and required changes to the document.

After those comments are received and any necessary revisions are made, city commissioners must schedule a final public hearing and vote for the comprehensive plan before it is resubmitted to the DEO for a final review and then officially adopted by the city.

City commissioners estimate that the comprehensive plan changes could be officially adopted as early as the end of June, pending approval by the state.

To review all of the proposed changes for the comprehensive plan, visit the LaRue Planning website.

Related coverage

 

Public gives input on comprehensive plan changes