Skip to main content

Tag: david zaccagnino

Former Holmes Beach commissioner arrested for domestic battery

HOLMES BEACH – A call to police resulted in the arrest of a former Holmes Beach city commissioner after an altercation at his home.

The incident happened on Oct. 13 when Mauri Zaccagnino called police in reference to a fight with her husband, former Holmes Beach Commissioner David Zaccagnino, 52.

Officers Chris Bennett and Ryan Welch responded to the Zaccagnino residence in Holmes Beach to get statements from both parties.

Former Holmes Beach commissioner arrested for domestic battery
Zaccagnino

“Mrs. Zaccagnino made contact with us outside the residence a couple houses down the street, and advised that she had called,” Bennett wrote in his report. “She stated that the two of them were cleaning out a closet to place things in storage in the attic and began arguing over what was going to be placed where, when Mr. Zaccagnino intentionally pushed her with open hands off a step stool she was standing on.”

Bennett’s report goes on to say that Zaccagnino began to throw items, but not at his wife, and kicked the stool at her.

While police say she was visibly shaken and crying during their interview, she admitted there were no physical injuries, and an examination of her arms and face showed no signs of injuries to the officers.

Zaccagnino told police his wife had been badgering him, and corroborated the statement his wife made regarding the argument about what to put in storage. He went on to say that he walked away, at which time she followed him and continued to badger him, according to the report. Zaccagnino also denied pushing his wife off the stool, stating he was actually the one who had been standing on the stool during the argument.

After interviewing both parties, police handcuffed Zaccagnino, arrested him for misdemeanor domestic battery and transferred him to Manatee County Jail, where he was released on $500 bond the next day.

If convicted, he faces up to a year in jail and up to a $1,000 fine for the first-degree misdemeanor offense.

City manager amendment lacks supermajority support

City manager amendment lacks supermajority support

HOLMES BEACH – The quest to hire a city manager in Holmes Beach has suffered a significant setback, but the matter has not yet been officially decided.

Switching from a strong mayor to a city manager form of government would require a charter amendment recommended by the Holmes Beach Charter Review Commission (CRC) and supported by the city’s registered voters.

The Holmes Beach mayor’s responsibilities are set forth in Article IV of the city charter.

During the Thursday, April 4 CRC meeting, member Sean Murphy made a motion to leave Article IV as currently written.

“There shall be a mayor who shall be the chief executive officer of the city. The mayor shall be responsible to the electorate for the administration of all city affairs placed in his/her charge by or under this charter,” according to Article IV, §4.01.

“I recommend we make no changes to Article IV,” Murphy said when making his motion.

David Zaccagnino supported Murphy’s motion. CRC chairman Ed Upshaw and members Claudia Carlson and Nancy Deal opposed it.

Confusion then ensued as to what that 3-2 vote meant regarding the potential hiring of a city manager.

According to §13.03 of the city charter, “Any proposed amendment or amendments to the charter adopted by a vote of a supermajority of the charter commission shall be presented to the city commission which shall provide for its submission to the voters in the next city general election.”

A supermajority vote means at least four of the five CRC members must support a proposed charter amendment for it to move forward.

Filling in for City Attorney Patricia Petruff at Thursday’s meeting, attorney Thomas Thanus said, “There may be some confusion about the last vote. There were three ‘no’ votes and two ‘yes’ votes, which means the motion didn’t carry. The motion was to not make any changes to Article IV. That motion was defeated, which means that Article IV is still up for discussion. You’ve haven’t closed the door on any further discussion.”

The CRC members can continue debating the city manager question, but Thanus said any proposed amendment that doesn’t have supermajority support will not be included in the final recommendations presented to city commissioners.

“You still have the option of revisiting some or all of your decisions, but you will get to a point where you will have a final vote. At that point, it would take four ‘yes’ votes in order for something to be presented to the voters at a referendum,” Thanus said.

“You’ve had other 3-2 votes, which means you have not achieved the supermajority,” Thanus said regarding previous votes taken on other potential amendments.

City manager debate

During Thursday’s meeting, CRC members shared their personal views on the city manager issue.

“I think the process works. It is more democratic. Little towns like ours are the community garden of democracy and I think we need to do whatever we can to protect that,” Murphy said of the city’s current form of government.

“We have good strong department heads. I don’t think the chief of police needs another boss – and it’s expensive,” Murphy said of a city manager.

Carlson suggested it was undemocratic to prevent city residents from determining which form of government they want.

“The logic of that escapes me. The citizens have the right to make a choice,” Carlson said.

Zaccagnino said hiring a city manager would add another layer of government and make it harder for citizens to enact change through their elected officials. He also disputes the notion that a city manager can remain politically-neutral.

Zaccagnino and Murphy both noted citizens can still initiate by petition a city referendum if they wish to continue the pursuit of a city manager.

Upshaw said the CRC’s duty is not to set policy, but to present viable options to the public.

“There is a section of our citizens who favor this. Are they the majority, I don’t know? But the question keeps coming up. I think it should go before the citizens,” Upshaw said.

Upshaw said a citizen-initiated city manager referendum that does not fully address all aspects of the proposed hiring could cause “chaos.”

Recent hiring questioned

Deal questioned Mayor Judy Titsworth’s recent hiring of Barney Salmon as the city’s new development services director and whether Salmon serves as a department head whose hiring should have required city commission approval.

“Some people think it was an end-around to avoid having a city manager,” Deal said. “As to adding another layer to the administration, isn’t that what the mayor just did?”

The charter states the mayor needs commission concurrence to appoint or remove a department head or charter official whose position is listed in the charter. The charter doesn’t reference a developmental services director.

Human Resources Analyst Mary Buonagura defended the recent hiring.

“Mr. Salmon is the director of five developmental services. He coordinates work, period. He reports to the mayor just like the rest of the departments do. Mr. Salmon is not going to be recommended to become a charter member of the city. It’s not necessary,” Buonagura said.

David Zaccagnino

Revamped Center board focuses on finances

ANNA MARIA — The Center of Anna Maria Island’s 2017-18 budget process is underway and board Chair David Zaccagnino hopes the numbers will reflect the organization’s commitment to the community.

Zaccagnino presided over his first meeting as chair June 21, presenting the Center’s current financial state along with his hopes for the future of the nonprofit.

Following up on a hope expressed by former board Chair Patty McBean, Zaccagnino said he had committed to going through the Center’s finances line by line, paying particular attention to any irregularities and places where the organization can potentially cut costs.

According to Center Treasurer Jim Froeschle, the organization is operating at expected expense levels, the issue with the finances comes in the amount of revenue it’s receiving from donors, the three Island cities and Manatee County.

Zaccagnino said he has gone through the Center’s four credit card statements, all with a combined total of $525, and is working his way through the rest of the financial statements. He met the morning of June 21 with former chair Bill Shuman, who is currently a board member, to go over his findings.

Zaccagnino said McBean was invited to the meeting but did not attend.

Board membership

McBean, along with Sam Pakbaz, Margie Shard, Frank Agnelli and Ed Chiles all resigned from the Center’s board following the outfall of an emergency meeting held June 19 when Shuman resigned. McBean was promoted from vice chair and then quickly replaced with Zaccagnino in a 10-4 vote held by e-mail and confirmed at the June 21 meeting.

While most resigned from the board because of added pressure from the community, Zaccagnino said, Chiles resigned due to a new business venture. The resignations bring the board members numbers down to 10. The maximum number allowed under the Center’s current bylaws is 17 board members.

Committees

Zaccagnino said the board is in the midst of forming two committees.

One is a human resources committee to study employee compensation and benefits. The committee also will advise Lessig on best employee practices and develop a set of benefit rule “so everyone is treated the same.” Zaccagnino says he hopes the new direction will reduce turnover, even if the Center is not financially able to be monetarily competitive with similar organizations in nearby municipalities.

The second committee is a financial review committee to help keep the Center’s revenue and spending in check. Though Zaccagnino invited all three Island cities to assign a representative to participate on the committee, he did stress that anyone viewing the Center’s financial statements would have to sign a nondisclosure agreement, something Holmes Beach Commissioner Carol Soustek doesn’t think city officials can agree to.

Soustek said agreeing to a nondisclosure could be a conflict for commissioners who serve as liaisons to the Center because of their charge to report findings back to their respective city commissions.

Bradenton Beach Commissioner John Chappie said he appreciated “the openness of what you’re talking about today.”

Zaccagnino said he’s primarily concerned with “getting the train back on the rails.”

Financials

Froeschle reported the Center’s May financial results were $18,800 in the black during a typically slow month. The numbers were helped by donations from the cities of Holmes Beach and Anna Maria toward the Center’s youth program, which left that area $15,100 in the black. That area along with $35,000 after expenses in fundraising resulted in the positive May number.

To date, the Center is still negative $226,300 with an expected loss of $230,000 to $240,000 by the June 30 end of the fiscal year, according to Froeschle.

Going forward, Froeschle said the organization’s strategy is to focus on membership revenue, investing in its programs and building new revenue streams, which has been an issue for the nonprofit in the past.

Part of the Center’s plan is developing a new generation of donors. The problem with that segment of the plan, Froeschle said, is the new generation of islanders may not have any historic ties to the Center so reaching out to them may be more difficult.

Transparency and the budget

Both Froeschle and Zaccagnino say they want to increase the transparency behind Center operations to help the community and city leaders feel more comfortable with the nonprofit.

Part of that transparency is hosting monthly open board meetings. Another part is creating a budget that helps the Center adapt to its current circumstances while still remaining in the community for current and future generations.

“The budget is taking priority over expense oversight but we’re starting the process,” Shuman said.

Lessig identified several areas where the Center can save funds in the coming fiscal year, which begins July 1. One is in non-recurring investments including staff conferences and training, marketing and promotion investments and professional fees. Those program areas, Lessig estimates, can be cut to save the Center around $27,500 in the coming year.

Lessig also seeks to renegotiate some of the organization’s service contracts to save between $15,000 and $23,000 in the new fiscal year. She also is looking at expanding the Center’s partnership opportunities with local organizations and businesses, along with advertising facility rentals and seeking grant opportunities.

Though the budget won’t be ready for the July 1 first day of the new fiscal year, a detailed version was planned to be collected by the Center’s accountant, condensed and delivered to Lessig by June 26 for review. A closed meeting of Lessig and other board members is scheduled to be held June 28 to review the budget. A full presentation of the budget from program directors and a board vote is scheduled for 6 p.m. Wednesday, July 19, at the Center, 407 Magnolia Ave., Anna Maria.