Skip to main content

Tag: tree removal

Coquina Beach improvements require more Australian pine removals

More Australian pine removals at Coquina

BRADENTON BEACH – Manatee County commissioners have approved the phase two Coquina Beach drainage improvement plans that call for the removal of 87 additional Australian pine trees.

Native trees will be planted on a one-to-one ratio as replacements for the removed Australian pines, as was the case with phase one of the county project, and in accordance with the city of Bradenton Beach’s land development code. The replacement trees will consist of shady lady black olive trees, gumbo limbos and green buttonwoods.

The replacement trees for the 103 Australian pines removed from the south end of the beach parking lot during the phase one project last year were planted last week.

Coquina Beach improvements require more Australian pine removals
The new phase one replacement trees were planted at Coquina Beach last week. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Public Works Project Manager Michael Sturm presented the phase two plans to county commissioners on Tuesday, June 16.

The phase two drainage and parking improvements will take place in the center and north parking areas of the county-owned beach in Bradenton Beach. The drainage improvements will include new stormwater pipes and paving the remaining unpaved parking areas with pervious pavement that allows rainwater to drain through it.

Coquina Beach improvements require more Australian pine removals
The map illustrates where the phase two drainage improvements will be made. – Manatee County | Submitted

Sturm’s presentation noted the completion of phase two would result in more than 900 striped and paved parking spaces at Coquina Beach. Approximately 700 of those paved parking spaces will be created in phase two. Sturm’s presentation notes the previous number of parking spaces was unknown because there was no formal layout for the unpaved spaces.

The estimated phase one cost was $3.36 million. The estimated phase two cost is $3.62 million.

Commission feedback

Holmes Beach resident and County Commissioner Carol Whitmore voiced the only opposition to the phase two plans.

“Now’s probably not even a good time for this to be coming up,” she said in reference to other parking issues that have surfaced on Anna Maria Island.

“Use that $3.6 million on something else we desperately need,” she said.

Commissioner Misty Servia felt differently.

“I am excited about the phase two project, especially when we consider the lack of parking out on the Island. The removal of the Australian pines in favor of native trees that are going to provide shade and canopy to the beach area is a great thing in my opinion. I am ready to make the motion for approval,” she said.

Commissioner Steve Jonsson seconded Servia’s motion and said, “I was certainly in favor of doing phase one first and seeing how that came out. I was out the visiting the site three weeks ago and it came out really well. It was a huge improvement.”

Jonsson said he was skeptical at first of the pervious pavement but seeing the phase one improvements changed his mind.

“I’m looking forward to getting the second phase done. We’ll have those 900 spaces,” he said.

Coquina Beach improvements require more Australian pine removals
This is an aerial view of the completed phase one drainage improvements. – Manatee County | Submitted

Commissioner Vanessa Baugh referenced a summary of facts included in Sturm’s presentation.

“Originally there were 990-plus Australian pines. In phase one, we only removed 103 of those 990-plus. Then in phase two it would be 87,” she noted.

Commission Chair Betsy Benac asked Sturm if the phase one and phase two improvements would produce more usable parking spaces at Coquina Beach. Sturm said they would.

Benac asked if the Australian pines along the multi-use path would remain in place. Sturm said they would.

Benac said she has not received any negative feedback since the phase one tree removals occurred and the phase one work ensued, and during Tuesday’s meeting, no one provided public comment on the matter.

“I am going to support this due to the fact that we’re going to have more usable spaces with these improvements,” Benac said.

Benac noted the paved parking spaces will provide beach access for all Manatee County residents and visitors.

“I think that’s a good thing,” she said.

The commission voted 6-1 in favor of moving forward with phase two, with Whitmore casting the only opposition vote.

City to county: 'Not so fast' on tree removal

City to county: ‘Not so fast’ on tree removal

BRADENTON BEACH – City Building Official Steve Gilbert has the city commission’s support to issue a stop work order on a county drainage project that would remove at least 103 and possibly up to 232 Australian pines from Coquina Beach.

This comes in response to the Manatee County Commission’s 4-2 decision on Tuesday, June 18 to remove 97 more Australian pines from the south end of the Coquina Beach parking lot as part of the county’s drainage and paving project. Six pines already were removed earlier this month.

“I think they knew they were going to have to take trees out, they just didn’t divulge it. They didn’t tell us there might be an impact to the trees.” – Steve Gilbert, Bradenton Beach building official

“This would not be ‘Stop, halt, desist and take everything out.’ It would be ‘Take a break and let’s talk about this,’ ” Gilbert told the commission on Thursday, June 20.

Gilbert, City Attorney Ricinda Perry and the commission agreed to first extend the courtesy of putting the county on notice before issuing a stop work order that would bring the county project to a temporary halt.

The city’s land development code prohibits planting Australian pines and other non-native nuisance species, but the code requires replacing each prohibited tree removed with an allowed species on a one-to-one basis. City code also requires the replacement trees to be at least five feet tall.

Memo issued

On Friday, Gilbert sent a memo to Manatee County Project Manager Michael Sturm.

“The city is hereby placing the applicant on notice that Manatee County must come into compliance with this Land Development Code. Please prepare and submit a plan showing the location of all trees to be removed in the project area, along with a signed/sealed landscaping plan to show the locations of the replacement trees, including a list of the tree species proposed. We will then amend the project application to include the landscaping plan,” Gilbert’s memo said.

“Please be advised that the Land Development Code authorizes the city of Bradenton Beach to stop work on a project when situations such as this arise, until sufficient information is provided to assure compliance with the code. Rather than take this action, my office would prefer that we collaborate on a solution. We ask that you take steps to prevent the removal of any trees until this matter is fully resolved. This is a matter of importance, and time is of the essence. We would like to meet with you as soon as possible to review the situation and the requirements,” Gilbert’s memo concludes.

“If you’re taking out 240 trees you will replace them with 240 trees,” Gilbert told the Sun earlier in the week.

He said county officials never mentioned tree removals when seeking the city-issued approvals and permits.

“I think they knew they were going to have to take trees out, they just didn’t divulge it. They didn’t tell us there might be an impact to the trees,” Gilbert said.

City permitting

The county-owned beach is within the city limits and the county project requires city approvals and permitting.

On March 1, 2018, the city commission unanimously approved the project’s proposed lot coverage that County Engineer Sia Mollanazar said would include 47,437 square yards of pervious concrete and 1,098 square yards of impervious pavement.

On June 13, 2018, Sturm sent City Engineer Lynn Burnett an email that said he and Mollanazar would appreciate the city waiving its permit fees.

The agenda item request that Burnett submitted for the June 21, 2018 commission meeting said the estimated permitting fees would exceed $100,000 and delay the project. The commission unanimously approved the county’s request, except for some minimal administrative costs.

During his two appearances in Bradenton Beach, Mollanazar never mentioned tree removals.

On April 10 of this year, Gilbert issued the county a zoning and land use permit that noted the county paid only $500 of the $48,190 that could have been charged in permitting fees, saving the county $47,690.

Commission discussion

During last week’s meeting, Mayor John Chappie said he talked to Manatee County Commission Chair Steve Jonsson. Chappie suggested the county money would be better spent addressing stormwater issues slightly to the north at Cortez Beach, where Gulf Drive and the adjacent bike lane are frequently flooded.

Vice Mayor Jake Spooner said the county project could have been designed with less impact on the trees had the county obtained a stormwater permit. Instead, county staff chose to place the drainage and paving improvements in the existing footprint of the parking areas and access roads. This alleviated the need for a state-issued stormwater permit.

City to county: 'Not so fast' on tree removal
Commissioners Randy White and Jake Spooner question the county’s proposed tree removal plans. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Spooner questioned the wisdom of completing the project’s first phase when there is now some doubt as to whether county commissioners will approve the project’s proposed second phase.

“The majority of the parking’s still going to be flooded down at the other end,” Spooner said of that potential scenario. “There’s a lot I don’t understand about this.”

Commissioner Ralph Cole said he supports the county efforts to discharge cleaner stormwater into the nearby natural waterways, but he said removing that many trees could negatively impact air quality.

Chappie and Commissioner Randy White said they didn’t recall hearing anything about tree removals when the county project was proposed to the commission.

City to county: 'Not so fast' on tree removal
Mayor John Chappie wishes the county would consider trimming and saving as many Australian pines as possible at Coquina Beach. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

When contacted earlier in the week, Chappie and Spooner both said they were very disappointed by the county commission’s decision, but they thanked commissioners Betsy Benac and Carol Whitmore for opposing the project as currently planned.

“I had hoped that at the very least the county would have considered the option of cutting down 50 trees and trimming the others,” Chappie said.

https://amisun.com/2019/06/24/county-commission-approves-coquina-beach-tree-removals/

Related coverage:

County Commission authorizes removal of six Australian pines

Proposed tree removals delayed

 

 

 

County Commission authorizes removal of six Australian pines

County Commission authorizes removal of six Australian pines

BRADENTON – Six Australian pines will be removed from the Coquina Beach parking lot for now and a comprehensive project report will be presented to Manatee County Commissioners on Tuesday, June 18.

County Administrator Cheri Coryea provided this update at the beginning of the commission’s Thursday, June 6, land use meeting. Her update pertained to the 102 Australian pines recently slated for removal as part of the county’s two-phase Coquina Beach parking and stormwater drainage project.

County Commission authorizes removal of six Australian pines
County Administrator Cheri Coryea requests the removal of six Australian pine trees. – Submitted

“We have an urgent matter we need to address. As you know, we’re reviewing the project of the Coquina drainage. We have received a recent update on some additional trees we may need to remove, but we don’t have all of those details. I’m here this morning to ask the board if we can move forward with removing six trees,” Coryea said.

“In the original plan, there were 30 trees in that area to be removed. We’re just asking for six at this moment. The six trees in question are in the path of the next area of the stormwater drainage that must be put in,” Coryea said.

Five of the six pines being removed are located near the open space and playground at the south end of the beach park. The sixth tree is located further to the north.

County Commission authorizes removal of six Australian pines
This map illustrates the location of the six Australian pines being removed. – Manatee County | Submitted

Coryea said the Woodruff & Sons construction company is now mobilized and working, and the construction materials are also on-site.

“By doing this, we won’t have to demobilize or move materials. That would cost us a great deal and require us to move some things out in lieu of the June 18 meeting,” Coryea said.

Commissioner Priscilla Trace made the motion to authorize the removal of six trees.

Commissioner Misty Servia asked if those trees were all located in the parking area.

“Yes, and I did confirm they are six Australian pines,” Coryea said. “We’ve made a count, there are 991 Australian pines out at that location – a total of over 1,500 trees that we’ve mapped.”

Commissioner Carol Whitmore asked how much additional delays would cost the county and how it might impact sea turtle nesting season.

“That’s going to be part of your report. If we can allow them to proceed with just those six, we’ll be able to finish that small portion and it will not create a delay until after your June 18th meeting,” Coryea said.

Whitmore also mentioned an email Bradenton Beach Mayor John Chappie sent Coryea and the commissioners requesting the project be redesigned.

Coryea said a complete redesign is “highly unlikely.”

Commissioner Betsy Benac said she would support Trace’s motion but noted the commission needs a full picture of what’s proposed for the entire project.

“A lot of people are very concerned. People love that beach. The six trees is okay, but I’m not committing at all to what will happen. It needs a lot more input,” Benac said.

She also said she asked County Attorney Mickey Palmer to review the Woodruff & Sons contract.

Commissioner Reggie Bellamy said he talked to local businessman Ed Chiles about potential recycling opportunities and he asked if the county plans to reuse the wood from the removed trees.

“It may be an opportunity to take lemons and make lemonade,” Bellamy said.

“That’s a good idea,” Commission Chair Steve Jonsson said.

Jonsson opened the discussion to public comment but there was none – the impromptu tree discussion was not noticed in advance.

The commission voted 7-0 in support of removing the six trees.

Coryea said the June 18 report will include maps that detail the locations of trees to potentially be removed and the costs and impacts of incurring any additional delays. She said the project engineers will be on-hand for the meeting that will also provide citizens the opportunity to express their views.

County commission meetings start at 9 a.m. It is not yet known what time the tree removal discussion will occur. Meeting agendas are posted at the county website.

Public opposition

When contacted on Thursday, Chappie said, “Before the meeting on the 18th, Cheri will be meeting with me to go over what the report says.”

He also said, “I just got off the phone with Mike Norman and he’ll have 1,000 petition signatures that he’s getting to me.”

The petition signatures represent the public opposition to the tree removals. That opposition swelled after the city resident and owner of Mike Norman Realty complained to Chappie and Vice Mayor Jake Spooner after seeing Cindy Lane’s photograph and cutline in the May 22 issue of The Sun.

The concerns expressed by Norman and others prompted an emergency city commission meeting on May 24. Chappie then conveyed his commission’s concerns to county commissioners on May 28.

On Friday, Chappie hand-delivered 1010 petition signatures to Coryea and/or Jonsson.
“We the undersigned, love the Australian pines at Coquina Beach. We beseech you to come up with an alternate plan for the Coquina drainage project that does not include cutting down these majestic trees,” the petition language says.

County Commission authorizes removal of six Australian pines
Bradenton Beach Mayor John Chappie holds up the 1010 petition signatures discussed at the June 6 City Commission meeting. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

During the week, Chappie and Jonsson exchanged several emails regarding the Coquina Beach project.

On Monday, June 3, Jonsson sent Chappie an email that said, “Do you think Bradenton Beach, perhaps the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency), would be interested in putting some money towards any redesign work if we go that way?”

After discussing that possibility with the CRA on June 5 and the City Commission on June 6, Chappie is authorized to pursue that possibility if it’s given county consideration.

Related Coverage

Proposed Tree Removals Delayed

County’s Plan to Remove Coquina Beach Trees Meets Opposition

Proposed tree removals delayed

Proposed tree removals delayed

BRADENTON BEACH – More than 100 Australian pine trees designated for removal at the south end of the Coquina Beach parking lot will not be removed, at least until Manatee County commissioners review a comprehensive staff report on the project.

County Administrator Cheri Coryea announced the delay during the county commission’s Tuesday, May 28 budget work session, responding to remarks made by Bradenton Beach Mayor John Chappie during citizens’ comments.

On Friday, May 24, the Bradenton Beach Commission held an emergency meeting and authorized Chappie to send Coryea a letter expressing the commission’s concerns about the proposed tree removals and the lack of communication from the county about the plans.

Project permitting

Heavy equipment is already on site and some preliminary work has occurred for the first phase of the two-phase Coquina Beach drainage and parking lot improvement project.

Proposed tree removals delayed pending county staff report
These Australian pines along the south entry road are currently slated for removal. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

In May, Manatee Public Works Department Project Manager Michael Sturm sent county staffers Carmine DeMilio and Jeff Streitmatter an email containing the subject line: “Coquina Phase 1 Australian Pine Removal.”

No one representing the city of Bradenton Beach was copied on Sturm’s email, which states, “The certified Arborist has determined that the trees shown on the attached PDF are a risk for beach visitors if left in place. His conversation was that the 10-inch-deep excavation that will occur to construct the curb located on each side of the concrete drive and parking areas will threaten the stability of the shallow foundation roots known to occur with Australian pine trees. His recommendation was to remove 102 trees. I have also included the cost associated with the removal and disposal of the trees.”

Proposed tree removals delayed pending county staff report
This is one of five Manatee County illustrations that reference the removal of Australian pines. – Manatee County | Submitted

Dated May 9, the attached $144,441 change order submitted by Woodruff & Sons included $71,775 for tree removal and $2,652 for root pruning by Terry’s Tree Service. When addressing the county commission, Chappie referenced the change order, which he first saw earlier that day.

The drainage and parking project at the county-owned beach requires a city-issued building permit. On April 10, the county received from the city a land use and zoning permit. The permitting request presented to city commissioners earlier this year included no mention of tree removals.

Proposed tree removals delayed pending county staff report
Trees marked with a red X or an underlined red X are currently slated for removal. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

The county’s original 100 percent design documents include language that says the contractor shall protect all existing structures, utilities, driveways, sidewalks, fences, trees and landscaping or repair or replace them to equal or better than pre-construction conditions. The design document also says, “All existing trees shall remain unless otherwise noted.”

Mayor addresses county

Chappie thanked Coryea for her quick response to the city’s letter before reading it aloud to county commissioners.

“The city of Bradenton Beach is adamantly opposed to the trees being removed. We are extremely hopeful the county will not follow through with such a disturbing act that would change the great character of Coquina Beach.

Proposed tree removals delayed pending county staff report
Bradenton Beach Mayor John Chappie expresses the city’s concerns about the proposed tree removals. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

“Australian pines, despite their designation as an invasive nuisance tree, do provide tremendous benefits for our residents, visitors, as well as the birds and wildlife. This is the right plant in the right location. Further, there are no homes or structures in danger of being harmed by a limb or tree. These trees enhance the park and provide a tremendous tree canopy for the south end of the Island,” Chappie said.

“We strongly encourage the county commission to take some time and reconsider the destruction and removal of the Australian pine canopies. The guiding light needs to be ‘Save the trees.’ This is a large park, there are significant open area spaces. I believe there is great opportunity for us to be creative and the city would be more than happy to assist. The city is also requesting a special city commission meeting with a county representative to explain this plan. We just want to understand what’s going on,” Chappie said.

County response

Commissioner Carol Whitmore said she sent Coryea an email containing questions she has about the tree removals and project contract.

Commissioner Betsy Benac said, “Those trees provide shade. As we all know from this weekend, shade is invaluable. I’ve heard many stories about Australian pines and that they aren’t good for habitat. Well, they’re good for this habitat. I certainly would want to do everything we can to save the shade.”

Proposed tree removals delayed pending county staff report
County Administrator Cheri Coryea said no trees will be removed until county commissioners review a comprehensive staff report. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Coryea said, “We anticipated possibly giving you information, but as this unfolded over the last day or so we would rather quickly pull together a full and comprehensive report. We want to look at how many trees in totality are in that area and give you some idea of the approach of what that removal is.

“There’s no removal today. We held them off. We will plan to act quickly though,” Coryea said, noting delays incurred now could impact the project timeline in January or February.

“So, we’re not doing anything until we hear from you guys?” Whitmore asked.

“There’s no removal that’s going to happen today,” Coryea said.

“You just said ‘today,’ ” Whitmore responded.

Coryea clarified no tree removals would occur until county commissioners reviewed the staff report.

“We don’t want to put our project at risk either. We’ll make sure we’re back here shortly,” Coryea said.

Commissioner Vanessa Baugh asked if another type of tree could be planted to replace the Australian pines removed. Coryea said that would also be included in the report.

“I just don’t want a line of new palm trees, that’s no shade,” Whitmore said.

In response to comments she saw posted on Facebook, Whitmore also stated the Town of Longboat Key is not involved with the Coquina Beach project.

Follow-up communication

On Wednesday, May 29, Manatee County Information Outreach Manager Nick Azzara addressed the tree removals in an email he sent to a television journalist. He later shared that email with The Sun.

“There are no plans to remove all the Australian pines at Coquina Beach and there are no plans to remove trees that provide shade along the nearby exercise trail. There are nearly 1,100 Australian pines there today and a small percentage are recommended for removal,” Azzara wrote.

At week’s end, the staff report had not yet been presented and no additional public discussion had occurred. The county commission has a budget work session at 9 a.m. on Tuesday, June 4 and a land use meeting at 9 a.m. on Thursday, June 6.

Related Coverage

County’s plan to remove Coquina Beach trees meets opposition

Grand Tree Speakers

Amended tree ordinance now in effect

ANNA MARIA – Anna Maria Commissioners recently adopted an amended tree ordinance, then promptly applied it when approving two grand tree removal requests previously denied by Public Works Manager Dean Jones.

In attempt to protect the city’s shrinking tree canopy, the ordinance adopted on June 14 allows those who wish to remove a grand tree to donate to the city’s tree replacement fund instead of or in addition to planting replacement trees on their own property. Donated funds will be used to plant trees at city parks or on other city properties.

Grand Tree Removal
Anna Maria Commissioners recently approved the removal of this grand tree at 319 Hardin Ave. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

During that meeting, property owner Ronnie Leto agreed to donate $2,500 to remove a grand tree at 319 Hardin Ave. Leto wants to remove the tree so he can install a pool in the yard. Robb Bauman agreed to donate $2,500 to remove a grand tree at 211 Oak Ave. Leto and Baumann both said new and smaller trees would also be planted on those private properties.

At the recommendation of certified botanist Lucas Davis, the amended tree ordinance removes the word “diameter” and replaces it with the word “caliper” in terms of a grand tree being defined as one that has an 8-inch caliper when measured at a height of 4.5 feet from the ground. A tree with an 8-inch caliper is approximately 24 inches in circumference, which is how the ordinance previously read.

According to both the previous and the recently amended ordinance, the removal of a grand tree requires City Commission approval. City ordinance also protects native trees.

The amended tree ordinance was inspired by a recent incident involving a property owner who removed a grand tree after the commission denied the request. As a result, that property owner was fined $5,000.

Ordinance language

“The removal, relocation, destruction of any grand tree, excluding ficus and Australian pine trees, is prohibited unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Commission that the location of the grand tree renders the lot or parcel as non-buildable, the grand tree is a hazard or severely diseased, or denial of the removal of the grand tree will result in an extreme hardship for the property owner, as determined by the City Commission after a quasi-judicial hearing,” the tree ordinance now says.

“If the removal of a grand tree is permitted, the city commission shall have the authority to require that replacement tree or trees of a type and size specified by the commission be planted on the same lot or parcel, which will result in approximately the same amount of shade/canopy potential within one year of the time of planting as the grand tree removed.

“As to any replacement tree (or trees) on the same lot or parcel, such replacement trees must be guaranteed by the seller of the tree (or trees) for no less than one year, and properly maintained by the property owner for a period of one year, so that if after one year the replacement tree (or trees) are not in healthy condition, as determined by an arborist, such replacement tree (or trees) will be required to be replaced by other replacement tree (or trees),” the ordinance says.

Grand Tree Anna Maria

Local tree regulations under attack

Updated Jan. 13, 2018

ANNA MARIA ISLAND – Florida Sen. Greg Steube (R-Sarasota) has filed a bill that seeks to prevent local governments from regulating tree removal and trimming and reserve that authority to the state.

City officials in Anna Maria and Bradenton Beach oppose the legislation and have asked their contracted lobbyists to lobby against it.

Steube filed Senate Bill 574 in October. Rep. Katie Edwards-Wapole (D-Sunrise) and Rep. Jake Raburn (R-Valrico) then co-filed HB 521 as its House companion in November.

Steube’s bill proposes that city and county governments may not prohibit or restrict a private landowner from trimming, removing or harvesting trees or timber located on private property; may not require mitigation including, but not limited to, planting trees or paying a fee to remove trees or timber from private property; or prohibit the burial of trees, shrubs or other vegetative debris on properties larger than 2.5 acres.

“I wonder how, with a clear conscience, he can sit in his gated community and decide that the state should regulate the tree canopy on Anna Maria Island.”
Dan Murphy, Anna Maria Mayor

The state Legislature’s 60-day session began Tuesday, Jan. 9 and is scheduled to end in March. Steube’s bill has been referred to the committees on Community Affairs, Environmental Preservation and Conservation and Rules. If adopted, the new state law would take effect July 1.

Bradenton Beach opposition

Bradenton Beach’s land development code includes grand tree protections and tree replacement requirements. Steube’s bill was discussed at the City Commission’s Jan. 4 meeting when Scenic WAVES Committee member Betty Rogers presented a letter the committee wanted to send to Steube.

Bradenton Beach Tree Protections
Betty Rogers and the rest of Bradenton Beach’s Scenic WAVES Committee oppose Greg Steube’s proposed tree removal legislation. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

“This is brought about by Sen. Steube for basically taking away our home rule over our tree trimming,” Rogers said.

“We are writing to you to voice our opposition to SB 574 as drafted. We strongly encourage you to reach out to us and other constituents who are educated in the value of maintaining and enhancing tree canopy in our communities,” the letter says.

“We believe it is not a one-size-fits-all issue. Our local governments are best positioned to balance individual property rights with economic, ecological and social benefits of the trees in our community. Canopy coverage in the city of Bradenton Beach provides an annual value of $46,133 in air pollution removal and carbon removal/sequestration,” the letter says.

“I don’t understand some of the things Sen. Steube does,” Mayor John Chappie said. “Yes, there are some things the state and federal government need to do, but telling us how we can trim our trees in little old Bradenton Beach is not one of them.”

The commission authorized the Scenic WAVES letter and asked for a similar letter to be sent on its behalf.

 Anna Maria opposition

“I wonder how, with a clear conscience, he can sit in his gated community and decide that the state should regulate the tree canopy on Anna Maria Island,” Anna Maria Mayor Dan Murphy said.

Planning and Zoning Board chair Jon Crane agrees.

“I am troubled by this proposed bill for a number of reasons. Municipalities understand why the preservation of some local trees is important to their constituents far better than Tallahassee does. The proposed bill will clearly lead to the indiscriminate removal of trees whenever it makes development cheaper and easier – and the environment be damned. The proposed bill would be one more step in the centralization of government. The proposed bill appears to benefit the Senator’s donors without regard for the wishes of his electorate. And by way of observation, the untrammeled development in the Senator’s district in Sarasota is creating a charmless, treeless concrete corridor,” Crane said.

In November, Anna Maria commissioners approved a request to remove two of the three grand trees located on an undeveloped lot on North Shore Drive. The commission insisted the third tree remain standing.

Anna Maria’s tree ordinance designates grand trees as those that are at least 24 inches around when measured at 4½ feet above ground, and removal of a grand tree requires commission approval.

Holmes Beach workshop

The city of Holmes Beach does not have a grand tree ordinance. Nor has its commission discussed Steube’s proposed legislation. Commission Chair Judy Titsworth became aware of the bill on Friday, when she received a legislative update from the Sen. Steube.

“It hasn’t come up at all, but we plan to workshop a proposed grand tree and native landscaping ordinance in March. We may have to move it up,” Titsworth said.

Steube’s position

Tree bill Greg Steube
Steube

The newsletter Steube distributed Friday featured his op-ed that was published in the Orlando Sentinel on Thursday.

“Many cities and counties in this state require you to obtain permission from them to cut down a tree, your tree, on your property. To me that flies in the face of your constitutional rights,” Steube wrote.

“I have heard from countless constituents who have been abused by these outrageous and unreasonable ordinances,” he added.

He mentioned a property owner being fined $16,000 for cutting down a dying tree without a permit, counties allowing pines to be cut down but not oaks, a citizen forced to replant and maintain a tree after he sold his property and another who was told to cut down a 50-year-old tree because it was an invasive species.

“My goal through this legislation is to stop the overreach of our counties and cities and return control back to the property owner pursuant to their inalienable rights provided in Florida’s Constitution,” Steube concluded.

Email the tree removal bill sponsors at:

  • Steube.Greg@flsenate.gov;
  • Katie.Edwards@myfloridahouse.gov;
  • Jake.Raburn@myfloridahouse.gov.

Email Bradenton Sen. Bill Galvano and Bradenton Rep. Jim Boyd at:

  • Galvano.Bill@flsenate.gov;
  • Jim.Boyd@myfloridahouse.gov.