Skip to main content

Tag: HB 1537

DeSantis vetoes vacation rental bill

DeSantis vetoes vacation rental bill

TALLAHASSEE – Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed proposed state legislation that would have significantly hindered city and county governments’ ability to regulate short-term vacation rentals locally.

The Florida Legislature proposed the vetoed legislation earlier as Senate Bill 280 and House Bill 1537. Legislators sought to preempt short-term vacation rental regulation and vacation rental advertising to the state, with the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation serving as the statewide administrative and enforcement entity.

Sen. Nick DiCeglie (R-St. Petersburg) sponsored SB 280 and State Rep. Philip Griffitts Jr. (R-Panama City Beach) sponsored House Bill 1537. Sen. Jim Boyd (R-Bradenton) and State Rep. Will Robinson Jr. (R-Bradenton) supported the vacation rental preemptions sought in the matching bills.

The proposed legislation also included a controversial carve-out that would have allowed Flagler County to continue enforcing its existing vacation rental regulations.

Veto letter

At approximately 6:30 p.m. on June 27, DeSantis sent Secretary of State Cord Byrd a letter informing him of the veto.

“Beyond creating new bureaucratic red tape that locals must comply with, CS/SB 280 prevents local governments from enforcing existing ordinances or passing any new local measure that would exclusively apply to vacation rentals. Under the bill, any such measure must apply to all residential properties. The effect of this provision will prevent virtually all local regulation of vacation rentals even though the vacation rental markets are far from uniform across the various regions of the state,” DeSantis stated in his letter.

DeSantis vetoes vacation rental bill
Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed CS/SB 280. – www.FlGov.com

“Going forward, I encourage the Florida Legislature and all key stakeholders to work together with the understanding that vacation rentals should not be approached as a one-size-fits-all issue. For these reasons, I withhold my approval of CS/SB 280 and do hereby veto the same,” DeSantis wrote.

Anna Maria discussion

Around the same time DeSantis vetoed the legislation, Mayor Dan Murphy told Anna Maria City Commissioners the city’s lobbyist, Matthew Blair, remained optimistic the governor would veto the bill.

Murphy said seven opposition campaigns recently initiated through the city-owned HomeRuleFl.com website resulted in approximately 3,000 letters, emails and phone calls being directed to DeSantis and his staff.

DeSantis vetoes vacation rental bill
Anna Maria Mayor Dan Murphy actively opposed the proposed vacation rental legislation. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

“The raw nerve was the Flagler County carve-out. There’s no logical explanation for the carve-out of Flagler County other than it’s the home of the speaker of the house (Paul Renner) and home to a relatively powerful senator (Travis Hutson),” Murphy said.

He also addressed the “pork chop” legislation references contained in the emails sent to DeSantis. He noted the Tampa Tribune newspaper coined the phrase “pork chop politics” many years ago while covering the patronizing and self-serving actions of Florida politicians who made laws that excluded certain people while impacting most others.

“It’s a lousy way to do politics,” Murphy said.

Island reaction

Later that evening, after learning of DeSantis’ veto, Murphy sent an email to city commissioners and others that said, “Congratulations commissioners and staff. Our governor vetoed the vacation rental bill tonight. I so much appreciate all of your support with our campaigns and efforts to stop this poorly thought-out piece of ‘pork chop’ legislation.”

Friday morning, Home Rule Florida distributed an email thanking subscribers for their efforts.

“Thanks to you and your thousands of letters and phone calls made to the governor, he saw that this was ‘pork chop’ legislation and simply bad policy. It’s amazing what we can do when we all pull together. The ‘pork chop’ has been chopped,” the email said.

When contacted Friday morning, Holmes Beach Mayor Judy Titsworth said, “I was out of town when I received the news. I am eternally grateful to the governor for allowing us to continue to self-govern and retain our ability to regulate our vacation rental industry accordingly.

DeSantis vetoes vacation rental bill
Holmes Beach Mayor Judy Titsworth appreciates Gov. Ron DeSantis’ veto. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

“The ability to regulate with daily fines allows us to bring all into compliance. The bill that was passed would have circumvented all regulations we have been able to use to restore the balance in our residential districts,” she said.

“Regulating this commercial industry in our neighborhoods is crucial in maintaining quality of life for our residents and to maintain our full-time population. This is crucial for our churches, our commercial and professional economy and our schools. The ability to enforce occupancy and length of stay would have been the biggest concern of this bill. It pretty much took all the tools out of our toolbox,” she said.

“I thank all those who wrote letters and participated in the Save Home Rule campaign. We are gaining residents in our city and it has everything to do with our ability to self-govern on quality-of-life issues. There is a lot to be said about being on the right side of history. I wish more leaders would figure that out,” Titsworth said.

DeSantis vetoes vacation rental bill
The city of Holmes Beach can continue inspecting and regulating short-term vacation rentals. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Holmes Beach Police Chief Bill Tokajer said, “The mayor and I are ecstatic that the governor vetoed this bill and left it to the local governments. We, as a city, are doing a tremendous job at monitoring our vacation rentals for safety for our visitors and residents alike. We also want to thank all the citizens from Holmes Beach and Anna Maria Island that reached out to the governor asking for the veto of this bill. A village came together on this and it is much appreciated.”

When contacted late Friday morning, Murphy said, “I was elated that we were able to once again stop this legislation from going forward. It shows that when we all work together, we can accomplish great things. This is an illustration of the power of the people and getting the message up to the governor. I’m extremely grateful to the governor for having vetoed it and for listening to the people who would have been impacted by this legislation. This was a statewide effort and HomeRuleFl.com played a large part in getting that message out.”

Regarding the proposed legislation, Murphy said, “The heaviest impact would have been pulling away the occupancy limits. For us, that would be an overnight increase of approximately 30% in terms of occupancy in our city. We don’t have the infrastructure for it. We don’t have the parking, the police, the sewer, or the water to cover a 30% increase. You could absorb it over time, but to pull the plug on us overnight is wrong. That was poorly thought out by Sen. DiCeglie,” Murphy said.

The proposed legislation would have allowed local governments to still conduct an initial inspection of a vacation rental property but would not have allowed annual follow-up inspections.

“That shows you how little the author of this bill knows about the vacation rental business. It doesn’t make sense,” Murphy said. “These homes experience constant turnover week after week. Things wear out. Things get broken. People will cram as many people as they can into a home. We find rooms with no egress, with smoke detectors underneath fans, with pool alarms and pool fences missing and those types of things. That’s not safe. This is not one-size-fits-all. Anna Maria, Orlando, St. Augustine and the panhandle attract different types of visitors.”

Despite this year’s success, Murphy expects the legislative battle to continue.

“It’s going to be back next year and the year after that,” he said. “They’re not going to go away, but fortunately the governor and his staff have enough wisdom to see this is not in the best interest of the State of Florida. It’s not in the best interest of the visitors and it’s not in the best interest of the voters. It’s in the best interest of out-of-state corporations like Airbnb and VRBO.”

Murphy will not seek reelection this fall and this was his final vacation rental battle with state legislators. During his 10 years as mayor, he repeatedly led Anna Maria’s annual efforts to defeat the Florida Legislature’s failed preemption attempts. He will soon turn those duties over to Anna Maria’s next mayor, Mark Short or Brian Seymour.

“I feel good that we have two candidates for mayor that are qualified to carry this fight on. We’ve got a good staff that’s trained and knows how to use these tools and we’ve got a good lobbyist. That’s what it’s going to take,” he said.

Vacation rental legislation awaits DeSantis’ decision

Vacation rental legislation awaits DeSantis’ decision

TALLAHASSEE – Gov. Ron DeSantis will decide the fate of proposed vacation rental legislation that seeks to preempt vacation rental regulation to the state.

Supported by the Florida Senate and House of Representatives, the legislation proposed in the matching House and Senate bills and now known collectively as CS/SB 280 would preempt vacation rental regulation, including vacation rental advertising, to the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR). DeSantis can sign the legislation into state law, allow it to become state law unsigned or veto it.

If DeSantis supports the state preemption, local and county governments, including those on Anna Maria Island, will lose some local vacation rental regulation authority and enforcement powers. If adopted as state law, local governments could still conduct annual health and safety regulation inspections, require an annual vacation rental registry and continue levying “reasonable” registration and inspection fees. The enrolled bill does not define “reasonable.”

Vacation rental legislation awaits DeSantis’ decision
Sen. Nick DiCeglie sponsored SB 280. – FlSenate.gov | Submitted

Sponsored by Sen. Nick DiCeglie (R-Indian Rocks Beach), the Senate, on Feb. 1, voted 27-13 in favor of adopting SB 280 as it was written at that time.

Vacation rental legislation awaits DeSantis’ decision
State Rep. Philip Griffitts Jr. sponsored HB 1537. – MyFloridaHouse.gov | Submitted

On Wednesday, March 6, the House members voted 60-51 in favor of the amended committee substitute version of SB 280 after adopting a lengthy amendment presented by Rep. Philp Griffitts Jr. (R-Panama City Beach), the sponsor of the original House bill, HB 1537. Rep. Will Robinson Jr. (R-Bradenton) voted in favor of the bill which was then sent to the Senate seeking Senate concurrence with the House-amended committee substitute version of CS/SB 280.

Vacation rental legislation awaits DeSantis’ decision
State Rep. Will Robinson Jr. supports the state preemption of vacation rental regulation. – MyFloridaHouse.gov | Submitted

While debating the House-amended bill on March 7, Sen. Bobby Powell (D-West Palm Beach) proposed a Senate amendment to the House amendment that would have grandfathered in any local vacation rental regulations adopted before July 1, 2024. After a spirited debate between supporting and opposing senators, 16 members supported Powell’s amendment and 24 rejected it.

Vacation rental legislation awaits DeSantis’ decision
Sen. Jim Boyd voted in favor of the vacation rental legislation. – FlSenate.gov | Submitted

After further debate, the Senate members voted 23-16 in favor of adopting the House-amended version of CS/SB 280, thus creating identical matching bills to send to DeSantis. Sen. Jim Boyd (R-Bradenton) and Sen. Joe Gruters (R-Sarasota) opposed Powell’s amendment and supported the final adoption of the bill. The 2024 legislative session ended on March 8.

Bill language

On Feb. 23, Griffitts told The Sun his primary goals were to create a statewide vacation rental registry database and to better ensure short-term vacation rentals are properly registered and all applicable taxes and fees are paid. Griffitts said it was unlikely that House members would adopt the Senate bill that then differed significantly from the House bill. However, on March 6, Griffitts presented the House members with a lengthy proposed amendment to the Senate bill, which the House adopted by a slim nine-vote margin.

Vacation rental legislation awaits DeSantis’ decision
The proposed state law would establish vacation rental occupancy limits set forth by the state. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

If enacted as state law, CS/SB 280 would require vacation rental owners, managers and operators to comply with a maximum overnight occupancy that doesn’t exceed two persons per bedroom, plus an additional two persons in one common area; or more than two persons per bedroom if there is at least 50 square feet per person, plus an additional two persons in one common area, whichever’s greater.

Adopted in 2015, Anna Maria’s vacation rental ordinance limits total occupancy to eight persons for any vacation rental home or unit built after that city ordinance took effect. In response to more than 100 Bert Harris claims filed within one year of the city vacation rental ordinance adoption, the city commission granted legitimate Bert Harris claimants additional two-plus-two occupancy exemptions that exceed eight occupants.

Vacation rental legislation awaits DeSantis’ decision
Florida cities could still enact local vacation rental registration programs if the new law is enacted. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Similar to local vacation rental ordinances, CS/SB 280 would require the vacation rental owner/operator/manager to designate a representative who can respond to complaints or emergencies by phone, or in person, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. That designated individual would also receive any violation notices issued by a local municipality or DBPR.

During the March 7 Senate debate, DiCeglie acknowledged only nine DBPR staff members would be assigned to oversee the state’s vacation rental regulation, but local governments would still be expected to assist with those efforts.

The proposed law would require local governments to issue written notices of violations of local laws, ordinances or regulations that don’t apply solely to vacation rentals but occur at a vacation rental property, including noise violations.

The proposed law would allow local governments to suspend a local rental registration for up to 30 days for one or more violations on five separate days during a 60-day period, up to 60 days for one or more violations on five separate days during a 30-day period and up to 90 days for one or more violations after two prior suspensions.

The proposed law would allow local governments to revoke or refuse renewal of a vacation rental registration if a vacation rental registration has been suspended three times.

The legislation states that as of Jan. 1, 2026, local governments must use the state’s vacation rental information system to notify DBPR of any local suspensions. DiCeglie acknowledged the state’s registration database would not be fully operational until 2026.

Mayor’s concerns

On March 8, Anna Maria Mayor Dan Murphy said he hopes to travel to Tallahassee to meet with DeSantis in person.

“I want to tell him what the implications of that bill would be for the city of Anna Maria,” Murphy said, noting he doesn’t know if DeSantis supports the legislation.

In 2020, DeSantis told a group of reporters he was not sure the state should be micromanaging vacation rentals, as reported by FloridaPolitics.com and others.

In past years, Murphy’s made several trips to Tallahassee to lobby state legislators and he’s disappointed that due to unforeseen circumstances he wasn’t able to get to Tallahassee while the legislature was still in session.

“I don’t think we did an adequate job of getting to the senators and explaining to them the implications. This bill shouldn’t have happened. Of all the vacation rental bills that have come across in recent years, this is probably the worst. The biggest impact is we’re going to have party houses and go back to the days of 25 people in a house. I’m exceptionally disappointed with the state legislature. I find it hard to believe that they couldn’t be more sensitive to the needs of their constituents,” Murphy said.

Murphy said the proposed square footage-related occupancy provision would be virtually impossible to enforce and enforcement of vacation rental advertising, including occupancy limits, would be preempted by the state.

When asked what the city could still do in terms of enforcement, Murphy said, “I’m still sorting that out.”

While awaiting DeSantis’ decision, the city will utilize its HomeRuleFlorida.com website to engage in an email-based opposition campaign directed at DeSantis.

Vacation rental bills in jeopardy

Vacation rental bills in jeopardy

TALLAHASSEE – Two vacation rental bills working their way through the Florida Legislature are not yet identical matching bills and time is running out for them to be made identical before the 60-day legislative session ends on Friday, March 8.

For legislation to become state law, the House and Senate must approve identical matching bills to send to the governor to sign into law, approve without signing or veto.

On Feb. 1, the Florida Senate approved Senate Bill 280 by a 27-13 final vote on the Senate floor. On Feb. 22, an amended version of House Bill 1537 successfully passed though the House of Representatives Commerce Commit­tee by a 13-5 margin, with Committee Chair Bob Rommel (R-Naples) among those opposing the amended bill.

The amended House bill and the adopted Senate bill are not identical bills. With no more committee stops, the House bill could be further revised through internal negotiations before Speaker of the House Paul Renner (R-Palm Coast) decides whether the bill will be brought to the floor for a final vote. If the House adopts a bill that doesn’t identi­cally match the Senate bill, both bills would be considered dead.

Vacation rental bills in jeopardy
State Rep. Philip Griffitts presented the Commerce Committee with an amended version of House Bill 1537. -MyFloridaHouse.gov | Submitted

When presenting his bill to the Commerce Committee, State Rep. Philip Griffitts (R-Panama City Beach) mentioned three primary goals: “Standardize the licensing and registration of vacation rentals, make available the information and the tools necessary for effective and efficient enforce­ment for good neighbor codes and ensure the effective collection of taxes due on vacation rental transactions.”

The lengthy amendment he then introduced was adopted without additional discussion.

When discussing his bill in general, Griffitts said the proposed occupancy limits are based on the Florida Fire Prevention Code provision that would allow one occupant per every 150 square feet. The Senate bill proposes a two-plus-two occupancy limit that allows two guests per bedroom and two additional guests.

Speaking on behalf of the city of Jacksonville Beach, lobbyist Jack Cory said, “This bill would erode the property rights of over 5 million constituents who bought and want to live in a homesteaded residential property. They do not want to live next to mini-hotels. Gov. DeSantis probably said it best when he said for us to be micro-managing vacation rentals, I am not sure that is the thing to do.”

Lauderdale Isles Civic Improvement Association Vice President Geoff Rames said, “HB 1537 will destroy our neighbor­hoods. Vacation rentals will run rampant without the fear of consequences.”

State Rep. Dan Daley (D-Coral Springs) said, “We talk so much about property rights. How about my freedom to not live next to a party house?”

When expressing his tentative support, Rep. Patt Maney (R-Shalimar) said “It frankly is a little frustrating for local governments to beat us up over preemption when they don’t do their job and exercise their police powers to control noise, trash and garbage, traffic and parking. If they won’t do it, they shouldn’t complain when the state decides to get a 800- or 900-mile-long screw­driver to tighten the screws.”

ADDITIONAL INSIGHTS

When contacted by The Sun the following day, Griffitts confirmed the House and Senate bills were not identical and he doesn’t anticipate the House members simply adopting the Senate bill.

“There are considerable differences. I don’t believe there’s a lot of buy-in with the Senate bill. The Senate bill will not pass the House,” he said.

Griffitts said he filed HB 1537 at the request of Senate President Kathleen Passidomo, who sought his assistance because of his family’s background in hotels and hospitality and his experience as a county commissioner and tourist development council member.

Griffitts, a Panama City Beach resident, said, “I have 12,000 registered vacation rentals in my county. I am infinitely familiar with the problems.”

Griffitts said he supports local governments’ ability to continue regulating and inspecting vaca­tion rentals.

“In my opinion, vacation rentals are no different than hotels. Why should they be treated any differently? The state just wants to make sure they don’t put somebody out of business,” he said.

ANNA MARIA REACTION

The amended House bill was discussed that night at the Feb. 22 Anna Maria City Commission meeting.

“They amended the bill and actually made it worse,” Mayor Dan Murphy said.

City Attorney Becky Vose said the House bill would limit local inspections only to items specified in the Florida Fire Prevention Code such as smoke alarms, battery-powered emergency lights, points of exit and floor diagrams. She said the city inspectors also monitor compliance with city regulations that require vacation rentals to have swimming pool fences, pool door alarms, stairway railings and other safety features not addressed in the fire prevention code.

She said the House bill doesn’t define sleeping accommodations and cots and sleeping bags could be considered sleeping accom­modations. She also noted House bill would give the vacation rental owners and managers until 9 a.m. the following day to respond to a complaint.

 

Related coverage

 

Vacation rental bill lagging in House of Representatives

Vacation rental bill lagging in House of Representatives

Vacation rental bill lagging in House of Representatives

TALLAHASSEE – As part of the Florida Legislature’s efforts to preempt local vacation rental regulation to the state, House Bill 1537 has not yet passed through the House of Representative’s Commerce Committee.

On Feb. 1, the Florida Senate approved Senate Bill 280 by a 27-13 vote. For proposed legislation to be adopted as state law, the House and Senate must approve matching bills to be sent to the governor to sign into law, approve without signing or veto.

HB 1537 was not slated for discussion at the Commerce Committees’ Feb. 15 and Feb. 8 meetings and as of Feb. 18, no additional committee meetings were scheduled.

Senate Bill 280 includes language that would require the vacation rental owner or operator to state and comply with a maximum overnight occupancy that doesn’t exceed either two persons per bedroom, plus an additional two persons in one common area; or more than two persons per bedroom if there is at least 50 square feet per person, plus an additional two persons in one common area.

House Bill 1537 doesn’t mention two-plus-two occupancy and simply says vacation rental owners and operators must state the maximum occupancy based on the number of overnight sleeping accom­modations.

The 60-day 2024 legislative session ends on March 8, leaving House members less than three weeks to pass HB 1537 through the Commerce Committee and present a bill that matches the Senate bill for a final vote on the House floor.

CITY OPPOSITION

The city of Anna Maria opposes the vacation rental bills that would impact the city’s ability to annually inspect vacation rentals and cap the city’s initial annual registration fee at $150 and subsequent an­nual registration fees at $50. Anna Maria’s current occupancy-based registration fee is $84 per year for the specific number of occupants allowed in that unit by the city’s vacation rental ordinance.

The proposed legislation would also impact the city’s ability to enforce occu­pancy limits by monitoring online vacation rental advertising.

“This is an ugly bill when it comes to regulating vacation rentals,” Murphy said during the city commission’s Feb. 8 meeting.

Murphy said the city-owned Home Rule Florida website, www.homerulefl.com, had already generated 7,248 opposition letters to SB 280 and each targeted senator received 302 emails. The city’s opposition campaign generated 17,225 opposition emails sent to House members, with each relevant House committee member receiving 392 emails.

“I know it’s effective, but it doesn’t seem to be changing the votes. It’s divided by party. Democrats are voting to kill the bill. Republicans are voting for the bill,” Murphy said.

Commission Chair Mark Short said he’s disappointed with the Florida League of Cities’ lack of opposition and he encourages citizens opposed to the bill to continue utilizing the Home Rule Florida website to express their opposition.

City Attorney Becky Vose said the two-plus-two occupancy limits in SB 280 are illusionary and essentially unenforceable.

“No matter what they put in there about occupancy, there are other provisions in the proposed changes to the statute that make it virtually impossible to regulate because it doesn’t allow you to use your typical code enforcement to regulate it. They require proof of five violations over a period of 60 days. Then you have to do certain things within a certain timeframe and you’re only allowed to suspend them for a certain amount of time. It makes no sense. So many things in this statute are very cleverly done to make it look reasonable, but it’s all smoke and mirrors because they take away your enforcement ability,” Vose said.

Murphy questioned the algorithms and calculation methods included in the Senate bill for the determination of allowed occupancy.

“You couldn’t possibly enforce those rules. There’s no mechanism to do it,” he said.

RENTAL OWNER’S PERSPECTIVE

Michael Wilcox and his wife, Jennifer, own the three-unit Casa Coconut AMI vacation rental in Holmes Beach. As a rental owner, Wilcox supports preempting vacation rental regulations to the state.

Vacation rental bill lagging in House of Representatives
Michael Wilcox owns and operates a three-unit vacation rental in Holmes Beach. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Wilcox lives and votes in Bradenton and said he doesn’t feel the Holmes Beach City Commission considers non-resident vacation rental owners to be part of their constituency. He said some vacation rental owners are reluctant to criticize city officials due to fears of retribution and he believes state regulation would provide rental owners with direct representation by state legislators.

Wilcox noted vacation rental beds now outnumber hotel/motel beds, according to the Florida Vacation Rental Managers Association. He noted the state uniformly regulates hotels and motels but vacation rental regulations vary from city to city.

“Hotels are regulated the same way in every city in Florida. Why can’t that apply to vacation rentals? We don’t even have the same rules in the three Anna Maria Island cities,” he said.

Regarding city-imposed annual registra­tion fees, Wilcox said, “This legislation reels in the cash grab from municipalities with the exorbitant rental registration fees. When I first started this, I paid $145 per unit in Holmes Beach. Shortly thereafter, it switched to $545 per unit. I have three units. My first renewal was $1,635. Who is served by me spending $1,635 for that service?”

Vacation rental owners and operators are required to collect and remit Manatee County’s 5% tourist development tax on all short-term lodging stays, in addition to the 6% state sales tax. Wilcox supports state legislators’ efforts to ensure the greater collection of vacation rental-related taxes and fees owed to the county and state.

Vacation rental bills advancing

Vacation rental bills advancing

TALLAHASSEE – The Florida Legislature’s efforts to preempt vacation rental regulation to the state took a significant step forward when the Florida Senate passed Senate Bill 280 on Feb. 1.

After previously passing through two Senate committees, the bill passed the full Senate 27-13.

If enacted as state law, the proposed legislation would further limit the ability of Florida cities, towns and counties to regulate vacation rentals and vacation rental advertising at the local level.

The preemption of vacation rental regulation to the state would impact all three Anna Maria Island cities to varying degrees.

Sen. Jim Boyd (R-Bradenton) and Sen. Joe Gruters (R-Sarasota) were among the 27 senators who supported the bill, originally introduced by Sen. Nick DiCeglie (R-St. Petersburg). Ten Democrats opposed SB 280, joined by three Republicans.

Vacation rental bills advancing
Sen. Nick DiCeglie introduced SB 280. – www.FlSenate.gov | Submitted

Originally introduced by State Rep. Philip Griffitts Jr. (R-St. Petersburg), the House companion bill, HB 1537, successfully passed through the House Regulatory Reform & Economic Development Subcommittee on Feb. 1 by a 10-4 vote. State Rep. Will Robinson Jr. (R-Bradenton) supported the bill.

Vacation rental bills advancing
State Rep. Philip Griffitts Jr. introduced HB 1537. – www.MyFloridaHouse.gov | Submitted

If HB 1537 successfully passes through the Ways & Means Committee and the Commerce Committee, it will then be brought to the House floor for a vote by the entire House before the 60-day legislative session ends on March 8.

In order to become state law, matching Senate and House bills must be adopted by the two governing bodies. If the final versions of the two bills are not identical, the legislation fails. If the identical bills are passed by their respective bodies, the legislation will be sent to Gov. Ron DeSantis to sign into law, to approve without signing or to veto.

As of Feb. 2, the Senate and House bills were not identical matching bills. The Senate-approved version of SB 280 contains two-plus-two occupancy limits not yet included in HB 1537.

The adopted Senate bill states the vacation rental owner or operator must “State and comply with the maximum overnight occupancy of the vacation rental which does not exceed either two persons per bedroom, plus an additional two persons in one common area; or more than two persons per bedroom if there is at least 50 square feet per person, plus an additional two persons in one common area, whichever is greater.”

As of Feb. 2, the House bill simply said the vacation rental owner/operator must “State the maximum occupancy of the vacation rental based on the number of sleeping accommodations for persons staying overnight in the vacation rental.”

Fees and taxes

The Legislature’s efforts to preempt vacation rental regulation to the state are partially driven by a stated desire to better address the collection of vacation rental registration and licensing fees and the collection of taxes levied on transient public lodging entities, including those on the Airbnb and VRBO advertising and rental platforms.

Several Florida counties levy tourist or resort taxes on short-term lodging stays. Manatee County levies a 5% tourist development tax on short-term lodging stays.

SB 280 and HB 1537 address at great length vacation rental advertising/rental platforms and the collection of fees and taxes.

In January, the independent, non-partisan Florida TaxWatch organization published a 16-page report titled, “The Impact of Unlicensed Vacation Rentals on Florida’s Economy.”

“In November 2023, an average day had an estimated minimum of 25,457 unlicensed vacation rentals with available listings, which is 19% of all available listings for that month,” the report says.

The report estimated Florida had an estimated minimum of 49,280 unlicensed vacation rental properties at that time.

“Tax evasion by unlicensed vacation rentals worsens the tax burden on dutiful, taxpaying residents and businesses,” the report says. “The loss of registration costs, required once per year, would be between $1.8 million and $6.9 million. If the unlicensed vacation rentals continued to operate in the years to follow, the state would see a loss of licensing fees between $1.2 million and $5.5 million. Collectively, local communities can lose up to $32,000 in local option transient taxes within a single day. If the unlicensed vacation rentals filed for a homestead exemption in the absence of permanent residency, up to $21.3 million in property taxes could be lost to fraud.”

Anna Maria concerns

During the Jan. 25 Anna Maria City Commission meeting, City Attorney Becky Vose voiced her concerns.

She said the Senate bill would still allow the city to inspect vacation rentals during the initial registration process but would not allow follow-up inspections in future years. She noted the annual inspections help identify violations and non-compliance issues that arise after the initial inspection takes place.

Regarding the city’s annual inspection fees, Vose said, “It would cap the initial application fee at $150 and cap all subsequent renewal fees at $50, which would transfer the bulk of the cost of regulation and registration of vacation rentals to the taxpayers of the city, which is totally unfair.”

Anna Maria imposes an occupancy-based annual registration fee established each year by a city-approved city resolution. The fee is based on the estimated cost of administering, regulating and enforcing the city’s vacation rental ordinance. The fee is $84.17 per allowed occupant, according to the city’s vacation rental ordinance. The fee for the owner of a two-bedroom vacation rental permitted to have two guests per bedroom plus two additional guests is $505. The annual fee for a 12-occupant vacation rental is $1,010 and the annual fee for a 16-occupant vacation rental is $1,346.

Vose also expressed concerns about the state’s ability to enforce the vacation rental regulations as a whole.

Mayor Dan Murphy recently said capping registration fees would significantly impact the city’s ability to regulate vacation rentals. During past discussions, he said the city’s enforcement of online vacation rental advertising is the city’s only means to regulate vacation rental occupancy. The city doesn’t have the authority to enter vacation rentals to count occupants.

Commission Chair Mark Short encourages concerned citizens to visit the Home Rule Florida website, www.HomeRuleFl.com, to express their opinions to state legislators.