Skip to main content

Tag: FEMA 50% Rule

Holmes Beach eliminates ‘lookback’ for substantial improvements

Holmes Beach eliminates ‘lookback’ for substantial improvements

HOLMES BEACH – Property own­ers in the city are no longer subject to a one-year lookback requirement regarding the total cumulative cost of repairs, renovations or recon­struction made to their structures.

The lookback period pertains to compliance with FEMA’s 50% substantial improvement/substan­tial damage rule.

According to the Manatee County website, “The 50% Rule is a regula­tion of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) that prohibits improvements or repairs to a struc­ture exceeding 50% of its market value unless the entire structure is brought into full compliance with current flood regulations. This may include elevating the structure, using flood-resistant materials and proper flood venting.”

In a December 2024 memo to city commissioners, Director of Development Services Chad Minor and Building Official Neal Schwartz stated, “This reason for this change is to allow existing structures that need repair, reconstruction, rehabilitation, alteration, addition or other improvements not to have to wait one year from the final inspec­tion date. Due to the hurricanes, several property owners that had made improvements would have to wait to pull a permit due to this one-year lookback.”

The proposed changes to the city’s one-year cumulative calculation requirements were presented to the Holmes Beach City Commission on Dec. 17, reviewed by the planning commission on Jan. 15 and adopted in the form of Ordinance 25-01 by the city commission on second and final reading on Feb. 11.

One of the clauses contained in the new ordinance says, “The city commission, at the recommendation of staff, has determined that rescind­ing the one-year lookback period relative to the accumulation of costs regarding substantial improvements is in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the public and is imperative to support the city’s recovery and continued participation in the NFIP.”

The previous city ordinance contained language that referenced repairs, renovations and reconstruc­tion “taking place during a one-year period.” That language does not appear in adopted Ordinance 25-01.

The previous ordinance also contained language that said, “For each building or structure, the one-year period begins on the date of the certificate of completion or the certificate of occupancy of the first improvement or repair of that building or structure subsequent to June 27, 2019.” That language does not appear in Ordinance 25-01.

Ordinance 25-01 now defines substantial improvement as, “Any combination of repair, reconstruc­tion, rehabilitation, alteration, addition or other improvement of a building or structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50% of the market value of the building or structure before the improvement or repair is started. If the structure has incurred ‘substantial damage’ any repairs are considered substantial improvement regardless of the actual repair work performed.”

Staff insights

During the Dec. 17 meeting, Com­missioner Carol Soustek asked staff if the city is allowed to remove the one-year lookback requirement. She was told the city could remove the requirement.

“If we pass this on the second reading (on Feb. 11) it will be effective immediately,” Schwartz said. “In the year period, over the lookback period, we’ve had several homes that have been remodeled up to 49% or under the 50% rule. Based on the damage they have received, they would have to wait one complete year from the completion (of previous repairs and renovations). Some of these weren’t even completed yet, so they’re caught between a rock and hard place so they just have to sit there for a year to start over. I didn’t think that was fair.”

Schwartz said he contacted state floodplain management coordinator Rebecca Quinn about eliminating the one-year lookback and he was told approximately 30 other municipali­ties were in the process of doing the same thing.

Schwartz said removing the one-year lookback requirement would not affect the city’s Community Rating System rating that currently provides Holmes Beach property owners with a 20% discount on flood insurance policies issued through or in conjunc­tion with FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program; and the CRS discount currently experienced in Holmes Beach is expected to increase to 25% on Oct. 1.

“Neal, you’re a genius. You have really altered some lives with this,” Commissioner Carol Soustek said on Dec. 17.

“Everybody knows my house was affected too. I feel for everybody,” Schwartz responded, noting that Soustek, Mayor Judy Titsworth and Commissioner Carol Whitmore were also among those displaced by the hurricanes.

Holmes Beach eliminates ‘lookback’ for substantial improvements
Director of Development Services Chad Minor assisted with the efforts to eliminate the
one-year lookback requirement. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

When presenting the ordinance for final adoption on Feb. 11, Minor said, “Due to the hurricanes, sev­eral property owners that had made improvements would have to wait to pull a permit to address this one-year lookback. This is striking that one-year lookback period.”

Schwartz said one of the goals is to prevent “phasing.”

“At the end of a permit, a permit has to be completed. You can’t go into phasing. Once you get that final (inspection), you get to start over. That is called phasing. FEMA looks very bad upon phasing. We could lose our CRS rating for that,” he said.

Petition seeks governor review of 50/50 rule

Petition seeks governor review of 50/50 rule

CORTEZ – Residents of Sunny Shores want help from Gov. Ron DeSantis to keep their homes.

Citing community stability and economic burdens, an online petition drive is ongoing for residents of Sunny Shores asking DeSantis to consider a review and exception to the FEMA 50/50 rule.

Homes in the Sunny Shores community were flooded during Hurricane Helene’s storm surge and many were damaged further by the winds from Hurricane Milton. A number of those homes are now subject to the 50/50 rule which prohibits improvements to a structure exceeding 50% of its market value unless the entire structure is brought into compliance with current floodplain regulations. Those regulations include elevating the structure.

Sunny Shores consists of mobile homes along with single and multi-family properties. The land is owned by individual owners.

The petition was written by Jamie Reed who did not attend a Nov. 20 meeting in the Sunny Shores clubhouse. Betsy Plante explained the petition to residents.

“There is a precedent in Lee County where an exception was made, we were told, where the county made exceptions to the rule,” Plante said. “Jamie decided to put this petition on the Change.org website.”

The petition may only be signed online.

“Go to Change.org and search and type in Sunny Shores,” Plante said. “It says ‘petition to allow and review exceptions to the 50% rule for Sunny Shores.’ It doesn’t have to be just Sunny Shores people to sign this.”

She invited people to post the petition link on social media and share it.

Many residents questioned what they said were low FEMA values for their homes on the Manatee County Property Appraisal site, noting that those values may make compliance with the 50% rule difficult for some.

“The first place to start is this petition and get as many people as you can to sign the petition,” Plante said.

Plante, who is president and co-founder of The Blessing Bags Project, a non-profit dedicated to helping the homeless population, raised concerns about homelessness if residents are unable to stay in their Sunny Shores homes.

“I’m concerned about seniors and homelessness,” she said. “What’s going to happen if you put these people out of their homes?”

One resident suggested the group seek legal representation in addition to the petition.

“Would you like to try to get an attorney to come here just as a consult?” Plante said. “Blessing Bags Project will take care of the fee for a consult.”

The petition

“We, the undersigned residents and interested parties of Sunny Shores, respectfully petition for a review of the current application of FEMA’s 50% rule. While we recognize the importance of safety and resilience in floodplain management, we believe that strict enforcement of this rule places undue financial and emotional burdens on our community, particularly in the wake of the recent hurricanes,” the petition introduction states. “We urge state leaders to consider exceptions or adjustments to repair and restore our homes in a way that is both economically feasible and sustainable.”

The petition sites five reasons for the request.

“1.      Economic Burden on Homeowners:

Requiring substantial modifications to meet current flood standards when repair costs reach 50% of a property’s structure value can create significant financial hardship for homeowners. Many residents in Sunny Shores, particularly those on fixed incomes, simply cannot afford the high costs of full compliance. This can force families to abandon homes they’ve lived in for many years, disrupting the fabric of our community.

  1.      Precedent for Exceptions:

In past hurricane recoveries, Florida communities have been allowed flexibility in enforcing this 50% rule, helping residents rebuild quickly and affordably. We believe similar considerations should be given to Sunny Shores, allowing our community to restore homes without unnecessary financial strain.

  1.      Expedited Recovery:

Exceptions for the 50% rule would enable our community to recover more rapidly from storm-related damage. Allowing repairs without extensive modifications can speed up the rebuilding process, reduce displacement, and help stabilize property values.

  1.      Community Stability and Livelihood:

Our community is strong when its residents are supported in their ability to stay and rebuild. By allowing exceptions to the 50% rule, Sunny Shores can maintain its local identity, support its economy, and ensure that long-time residents are not forced out due to unaffordable mandates.

Our Request:

We respectfully request that state and local officials work with FEMA to review the 50% rule as it applies to Sunny Shores. Specifically, we ask for flexibility or special consideration in cases where strict enforcement of this rule would impose severe economic hardship, especially for properties with significant historic and/or sentimental value. Such exceptions would allow us to protect our community’s character and give residents the opportunity to rebuild affordably.

We, the undersigned, urge you to support a review of the FEMA 50% rule for Sunny Shores and to work toward a fair and compassionate approach to floodplain management in our community.”

To sign the petition, visit Change.org.