Skip to main content

Tag: public parking

Planning board reviews parking regulations

Planning board reviews parking regulations

ANNA MARIA – Planning and Zoning Board members are reviewing the city’s parking regulations with an emphasis on reducing visibility challenges created by parked vehicles.

Joined by City Planner Ashley Austin and General Manager Dean Jones, Anna Maria Planning and Zoning Board members David Had­dox, Dusty Crane, Doug Copeland and Jeff Rodencal participated in parking regulation-related workshops on Aug. 21 and Sept. 19. The board recommendations produced during the workshops will be reviewed again on Oct. 31 before being presented for city commission consideration.

The board and city staff recommend regulation revisions that include prohibiting parking on multi-use paths and designated bike lanes and parking within a visibility triangle at a street intersection. Board members and staff also discussed prohibiting street-side parking within 10 feet of a driveway.

Driveway concerns

Earlier this year, the board mem­bers and city staff assumed city code prohibited street-side parking within 10 feet of a driveway, but they later learned no such prohibition exists.

When discussing a possible driveway-related parking prohibition in August, Copeland said, “When people park directly up to your driveway, you cannot see to get out.”

He noted the lack of visibility experienced when pulling out of a driveway presents a danger to families walking down the street and makes it difficult to see oncoming motorists.

Rodencal agreed but questioned how the city would enforce such a prohibition and notify residents and visitors of that new restriction.

Rodencal also questioned whether eliminating numerous public parking spaces located within 10 feet of a driveway impacts the city’s ability to provide the number of public parking spaces required to qualify for county and state-funded beach renourish­ment projects. He said city staff would need to review the city’s parking plan and determine how many parking spaces would be eliminated.

Copeland said he previously asked the city to install traffic delineators on each side of his driveway entrance. The delineators consist of a white and orange plastic sleeve slipped over a metal fence post. The delineators limit the available parking space and make it difficult to park without the vehicle’s tires encroaching onto the street pavement, which is a parking violation.

The board expressed concerns about the visual aesthetics of install­ing parking delineators at every residential driveway, and there is no desire to install more “No Parking” signs in the city’s residential areas.

“Obviously we don’t want to put up two parking signs at every driveway, but the plastic bollards are really not that offensive and they’re fairly effective,” Copeland said during the August workshop.

Jones said the city would incur the costs of installing and maintaining the parking delineators.

“It’s a great idea, but how do you execute it out in the field?” he asked.

During the Sept. 19 workshop, Jones proposed asking the city commission to consider allowing the public works department to install driveway parking delineators only as requested by residential property owners.

Visibility concerns

During the September workshop, Copeland said he received a call from a resident who expressed concerns about a rental business on Pine Avenue parking their golf carts in the street-side parking spaces located in the city-owned right of way. Austin said that’s not allowed and she would look into that.

Haddox expressed a similar concern about a small commercial truck that’s frequently parked in a city-owned parking space along Pine Avenue. Haddox said the parked truck creates a visibility challenge when exiting the post office parking lot. Crane said a sign located on or near the post office property also limits visibility.

Jones said he would diplomatically share the board’s concerns with those business owners.

Crane reiterated her previously stated concerns about the visibility challenges created by parked vehicles, fences and residential landscaping at the North Bay Boulevard and Poinsettia Road intersection. She said the landscaping at the North Bay and Jacaranda Road intersection also impedes visibility.

Planning board reviews parking regulations
Landscaping limits visibility at the North Bay Drive and Poinsettia Road intersection. – Joe Hendricks | Sun
Planning board reviews parking regulations
Landscaping limits visibility at the North Bay Drive and Jacaranda Road intersection. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Crane expressed concerns about the reduced visibility created by the landscaping at the Magnolia Avenue and South Bay Boulevard intersection.

“I agree, that’s a really dicey intersection,” Haddox added. “There’s just too much foliage there when you’re trying to execute a right-hand turn.”

Existing city code says, “On a corner lot, there shall be no parking or loading spaces, structure or planting which materially obstructs the vision of vehicular traffic within 20 feet of the two intersecting street right-of-way lines.”

Rodencal said similar visibility challenges exist throughout the city, and he asked what’s hindering the city’s efforts to address those concerns. Jones said he would research the board’s concerns.

Board member needed

The Anna Maria Planning and Zoning Board seeks a new volunteer member. Serving as an advisory board and recommending body to the city commission, the commission-appointed board meets one Wednesday morning per month to discuss and review matters pertaining to land use, building, development, construction, permitting and more.

To obtain an application, visit www.cityofannamaria.com/residents and click on “forms & permits,” email amclerk@cityofannamaria.com or call 941-708-6130.

Related coverage: Fences, visibility triangles, parking discussed
Elevating library could create more public parking

Elevating library could create more public parking

BRADENTON BEACHMayor John Chappie proposes further elevating the Tingley Memorial Library to create a ground-level public parking lot below the library building.

The city-owned library was built in the early 1990s using $240,000 of the $678,801 that Beulah Hannah Hooks Tingley bequeathed to the city in 1986 to create a public reading room. The remaining funds continue to be used to fund the operations of the library, which isn’t part of the county library system.

The library building is already elevated by approximately 6 feet, but that doesn’t leave enough space below for parking.

Elevating library could create more public parking
The library building is already elevated by approximately 6 feet. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Chappie initiated the library discussion during the June 6 Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) meeting.

He said the city doesn’t have the money to purchase additional land for public parking and the goal is to create more public parking spaces on land already owned by the city.

Chappie said he discussed the idea with Building Official Steve Gilbert and Gilbert suggested issuing a request for proposals (RFP) for the architectural and engineering services needed to determine the feasibility of elevating the library building.

CRA Chair Ralph Cole asked Gilbert if the building could be elevated.

“That’s why we go out and hire an architect, with an engineering firm in back of them, to look at it and tell us that,” Gilbert said, noting the wooden library building sits atop steel beams.

Elevating library could create more public parking
The wooden library building rests atop large steel beams. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

“You can jack up just about any building you want to, it just depends on how many zeros you want to throw under it,” Gilbert said of the potential cost.

He said the combined insight of an architect, an engineering firm and a house moving company would provide the CRA and the city with a better understanding of what’s possible.

“Will it work? Is it feasible? And if it will work, then how do we want to proceed? At that point, you have several decisions to make,” he said.

“I think it’s worth looking into. We need as much parking as we can get,” Cole said.

“I think you’re halfway there,” CRA member Ed Chiles said when suggesting looking further into the future to account for the city’s continued growth and increase in visitors.

“That’s not going to stop,” Chiles said.

He noted that the library property is located next to the city hall property and the two properties combined would create a large area to work with.

“I think we should look at the whole campus. If you’re going to go up, combine the library and city hall. That’s what we need for the next 30 years,” Chiles said.

Chappie noted there are state-imposed restrictions that limit the use of CRA funds. He said City Attorney Ricinda Perry will write a legal analysis/position paper that supports the proposed use of CRA funds.

“What I’m asking today is to direct Ricinda, myself and Steve to work on an RFP to utilize CRA funds for a public parking lot,” Chappie said.

The CRA members unanimously approved Chappie’s request.

Parking analysis sought

Parking analysis sought

BRADENTON BEACH – The Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) has authorized a $1,400 analysis of an existing city parking lot in hopes of creating additional public parking spaces.

The authorization is contingent on a pending determination from City Attorney Ricinda Perry as to whether restricted CRA funds can be used to fund the parking analysis, which would be conducted by Collier’s Engineering.

On June 6, the CRA members discussed the parking analysis of the city-owned public parking lot next to the cell tower and the public works building presented by Public Works Director Tom Woodard.

Parking analysis sought

This diagram illustrates the potential reconfiguration of the existing public parking lot. – City of Bradenton Beach | SubmittedCRA member John Chappie said reconfiguring the unpaved parking lot with angled parking spaces and other low-budget improvements could create seven to nine additional parking spaces, with four spaces still reserved for public works personnel. Improvements might also include parking for golf carts and bicycles, he said.

The parking lot would remain unpaved and stormwater and drainage elements would not be impacted, according to Chappie.

Woodard told The Sun the proposed parking improvements are not directly related to the city commission’s desire to potentially implement paid parking in that lot and other city-owned parking lots and spaces in the CRA district, which extends from the Cortez Bridge to Fifth Street South.

Anna Maria formalizes public parking reductions

Anna Maria formalizes public parking reductions

ANNA MARIA – The city of Anna Maria’s previous elimination of 88 public parking spaces has been formalized by the adoption of Ordinance 20-877.

Thirty-seven of the permanently eliminated parking spaces were located along North Shore Drive.

The city commission adopted the amended parking ordinance during the Tuesday, Nov. 24 meeting that served as the make-up date for the Nov. 12 meeting canceled due to Tropical Storm Eta.

During Tuesday’s meeting, Mayor Dan Murphy referenced a white paper he provided commissioners regarding the parking reductions. The white paper notes the three primary factors that drove the parking reductions were public safety, drainage and the previous elimination of public parking spaces in Holmes Beach.

“We’ve eliminated a net of 88 parking spaces. It’s been 15 years since we visited the parking ordinance within the city of Anna Maria. It was time to relook at it,” Murphy said.

Murphy said North Shore Drive has become a heavily traveled thoroughfare in recent years, but the street hasn’t gotten any wider. During peak periods, cars were parked on both sides of the road with children present, car doors opening in the roadway and construction taking place.

“It was an accident waiting to happen. We eliminated 37 spaces along North Shore, and it was all under the auspices of public safety,” Murphy said.

“We also eliminated spaces for drainage. People were parking on top of our drainage,” Murphy said in reference to the city’s granite- and lime rock-covered vertical infiltration trenches.

“And lastly, we were impacted by the changes made in Holmes Beach. We have pretty much recovered from all those changes. I think it’s a total of about eight spaces associated with the Holmes Beach changes,” Murphy said.

Anna Maria formalizes public parking reductions
Public parking spaces have been eliminated along Archer Way, at the south end of Anna Maria. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Murphy said 110 public parking spaces were eliminated earlier this year, but 22 were later restored.

He said the public feedback he received from residents has been positive, and some residents asked him why more spaces weren’t eliminated.

“If we can’t justify it for public safety, if you can’t justify it on drainage and it has nothing to with the Holmes Beach changes, there’s very little motion to take those away. Not wanting cars in front of your house, I get it, but these are the three factors we used,” Murphy said.

Murphy recommended reevaluating the impact of the parking reductions early next year, after the peak tourist season.

Beach renourishment requirements

Earlier this month, Manatee County Commissioner Kevin Van Ostenbridge threatened to attempt to withhold future beach renourishment funding for the city of Holmes Beach if that city’s public parking capacity is not returned to pre-COVID levels.

Anna Maria Commissioner Jon Crane asked Murphy about potential county pushback in response to Anna Maria’s parking reductions.

“Will the county lean on us? I’ve had preliminary discussions with two of the new county commissioners. I don’t anticipate anything from those two, but I can’t tell you about others,” Murphy said.

Murphy said Manatee County Parks and Natural Resources Director Charlie Hunsicker asked him to provide the county’s consulting company with a copy of the city’s revised parking plan.

“I sent them our plan a month ago and I have not heard anything since. We more than meet beach renourishment requirements,” Murphy said.

Murphy said the 2005 beach renourishment plan called for 70 public parking spaces within the renourishment zone that stretches from Cypress Avenue to the southern city limits.

“There’s no danger of us losing federal funding for beach renourishment. The rest of our beaches are all privately-owned and they don’t qualify for beach renourishment,” Murphy said.

Commission Chair Carol Carter noted Anna Maria only has a quarter-mile stretch of public beach that would qualify for potential future beach renourishment.

Commissioner Joe Muscatello asked when beach renourishment last occurred in Anna Maria.

Murphy said that occurred in 2005, and only for the beach area that extended south from Cypress Avenue.

Commissioner Mark Short noted Murphy’s white paper stated the city currently has 571 available parking spaces in that area.

“The fact that there are 571 available spots to me is something extremely important to point out,” Short said.

“I feel very strongly this is the right thing to do for public safety. It’s the right thing to do for our drainage. It is the right thing to do for the city of Anna Maria,” Murphy said.

While standing outside her home along North Shore Boulevard, city resident Lou Ann Williams said she was glad the parking spaces in front of her home were eliminated.

“I love the fact that they can’t park here anymore, for the simple fact that it is a hazard and there’s too many people. With so many people parking in my front yard, my family had nowhere to park,” Williams said.

Wheels off pavement

The city commission was also presented with the first of two readings on another ordinance that, when adopted, will further clarify the city’s existing requirements that street-side parking occur with no wheels on the pavement.

The city’s code of ordinances already provides parking exceptions that allow landscaping trucks and other service vehicles to park in no parking zones. At the discretion of code enforcement officers, service vehicles are also allowed to park with tires on the pavement while actively providing service.