Skip to main content

Tag: FDEP

FDEP allows beachfront development

FDEP allows beachfront development

ANNA MARIA – In a move that critics label “rogue,” the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) will allow Fedora Campbell to build a beachfront home seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL).

On Tuesday, July 20, FDEP issued its final order regarding Campbell’s 2020 development request for her vacant beachfront property at 105 Elm Ave.

“The final order granting Fedora L. Campbell’s application for a Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) permit to construct a single-family residence and associated structures seaward of the CCCL on Anna Maria Island in Manatee County, Florida is approved subject to the general and specific conditions set forth within the permit,” according to the final order, signed by interim FDEP Secretary Shawn Hamilton.

FDEP rules in favor of proposed beachfront development
Interim FDEP Secretary Shawn Hamilton issued the final order regarding 105 Elm Ave. – FDEP | Submitted

The order notes that any party to the proceeding has the right to seek judicial review by filing a notice of appeal with the Office of General Counsel in Tallahassee within 30 days.

The order does not allow Campbell to seek recovery of the attorney fees she incurred as the result of the administrative challenge posed by some neighboring property owners.

Campbell’s undeveloped lot is located seaward of the beachfront home at 107 Elm Ave., which North Carolina residents Wendy and Robert Jordan purchased for $4 million in April through their WAJ Rustic Vacations LLC. Wendy Jordan was born and raised in Florida.

The Jordans’ home is currently the most seaward home on that side of Elm Avenue and the construction of a new home at 105 Elm Ave. would at least partially obstruct their existing view. According to an email that Wendy Jordan sent Anna Maria Mayor Dan Murphy, the Jordans were unsuccessful in their recent efforts to purchase Campbell’s property for $2 million.

However, according to the official records of Manatee County, the Jordans did successfully purchase from Steven Decker the undeveloped lot at 103 Elm Ave. for $500,000. 103 Elm is seaward of Campbell’s property, which is now positioned between two properties owned by the Jordans.

Judge recommends order

FDEP’s order references a recommended order that Administrative Law Judge Francine Ffolkes issued on June 7. Ffolkes’ ruling was the result of a multi-day formal administrative hearing she conducted on behalf of the Florida Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH).

In her written recommended order, Ffolkes stated, “Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is hereby recommended that DEP enter a final order granting respondent Campbell’s application for a CCCL Permit to construct a single-family residence and associated structures seaward of the CCCL.”

The administrative hearing was requested by petitioners David Morris, Ling Liu, DAR Real Estate Enterprises and Richard Theidel in opposition to the FDEP construction permit and notice to proceed issued to Campbell in June 2020. The Jordans also oppose the FDEP permit but they are not named as petitioners in Ffolkes’ recommended order or FDEP’s final order.

“The structure authorized by FDEP’s CCCL (Coastal Construction Control Line) permit will substantially advance seaward the established line of existing construction,” the petitioners claimed in the petition for a formal administrative hearing filed on their behalf in August 2020.

“Petitioners specifically allege that as presently designed and authorized by Permit No. ME-1341, Campbell’s proposed structures do not comply with the applicable requirements and are not eligible for a CCCL permit. Petitioners seek a final order revoking Permit No. ME-1341,” that 2020 document states.

City permits required

The development of Campbell’s vacant lot at 105 Elm Ave. will still require city-issued building permits. As of Friday, City Clerk LeAnne Addy said the city had not received a building permit application for that property.

On July 6, Anna Maria Building Official Luke Curtis sent an email to Mayor Dan Murphy regarding the potential development of 105 Elm Ave. Curtis’ email noted that previous determinations provided by separate consulting groups in 2017 and 2018 confirm that 105 Elm Ave. is a buildable lot according to city code.

Despite being considered a buildable lot, the development of 105 Elm could still be hindered by the fact that Elm Avenue currently ends near the Jordans’ driveway and does not provide direct access to Campbell’s property.

In his email, Curtis stated, “Prior to any building permit being accepted by the building department, a development permit, along with a site plan including but not limited to access to the property, sewer, water and electric utilities, will need to be considered and approved by city commission.”

Preserve AMI

Assisted by Patrick Coyne, the Jordans recently launched the Preserve AMI campaign that addresses the Jordans’ efforts to preserve their own beachfront view while also addressing larger-scale concerns about the impact the FDEP ruling could have on many other undeveloped beachfront properties along Anna Maria Island’s Gulf of Mexico coastline.

FDEP rules in favor of proposed beachfront development
This map illustrates the many undeveloped beachfront properties near Elm Avenue. The Jordan property – with the house – and the vacant Campbell lot are highlighted in blue. – Manatee County Property Appraiser | Submitted

The PreserveAMI.com website contains an online petition that’s been signed by more than 1,000 people. The website also contains a video in which land surveyor Jeff Hostetler explains the permitting dispute and how the Jordan’s home was built for the previous owner according to the CCCL restrictions that existed in 2012.

When contacted about FDEP’s final order, Coyne declined comment and directed The Sun to the Preserve AMI website which now includes the headline: “Florida Department of Environmental Protection did not do the right thing!”

The website also states, “This rogue ruling could now start a destructive domino effect that could destroy our beloved AMI beaches, dunes, history, wildlife and tradition forever.”

In reference to Murphy and the Island’s other elected officials, the website says, “Now the solution to save our city of Anna Maria dunes and existing healthy ecosystem by stopping this new Florida DEP precedent is in Mayor Dan’s hands and all of our other local city of Anna Maria elected officials. Let’s see if they feel the same as we do about pushing new boundaries of construction into our dunes that the FDEP has until now protected.

“This is not just a local 105 Elm Ave. issue. This is an Anna Maria Island issue. Bradenton Beach Mayor John Chappie and Holmes Beach Mayor Judy Titsworth, please unite with Dan to help protect and preserve all of Anna Maria Island,” the website states.

It also states, “Tell Florida’s DEP Secretary to do the right thing.”

Signs, signs

The Preserve AMI campaign includes signs placed at and near the Jordans’ home. A visit to that area on Thursday, July 22, revealed two Preserve AMI signs alongside the Jordans’ driveway and another erected alongside the Elm Avenue beach access pathway. All three signs referenced Mayor Dan doing the right thing.

FDEP rules in favor of proposed beachfront development
This Preserve AMI sign was recently placed alongside the Elm Avenue beach access walkway. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

According to Anna Maria Code Enforcement Manager Debbie Haynes, the signs are legally placed on private property, but the Jordans were previously cited and fined $250 for a campaign-related sign placed on their property that exceeded the size allowed by the city’s sign ordinance.

According to a recent email exchange between Wendy Jordan and Murphy, the Jordans have requested a private meeting with Murphy. As of Friday, an in-person meeting had not yet been scheduled because the Jordans had been unavailable. In one email, Jordan noted Murphy is unwilling to conduct the meeting remotely via Zoom video conferencing.

When contacted by The Sun, Murphy declined to comment publicly on these matters. The Sun’s efforts to obtain comments from Campbell and her associates have not yet garnered any response.

Beachfront homeowners launch Preserve AMI campaign

Beachfront homeowners launch Preserve AMI campaign

ANNA MARIA – Homeowners Wendy and Robert Jordan recently launched the Preserve AMI campaign, in part to protect their mostly unobstructed view of the beach and the Gulf of Mexico.

The campaign also addresses wider-reaching concerns about the potential impacts of a pending Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permitting ruling. The Jordans and some of their supporters fear the anticipated ruling could establish a precedent allowing construction seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), which in turn could impact beach dune systems, sea turtles and other wildlife.

The Jordans own and operate the North Carolina-based Jordan Lumber & Supply company and several other timber-related businesses. In April, they purchased the beachfront home at 107 Elm Ave. for $4 million through their North Carolina-registered WAJ Rustic Vacations LLC.

According to the city of Anna Maria clerk’s office, the home was previously registered as a vacation rental, but that’s no longer the case since the change in ownership.

Before the Jordans’ purchase, some neighboring property owners had already filed a petition for a formal administrative hearing in opposition to a 2020 FDEP permitting decision regarding the vacant lot at 105 Elm Ave. Owned by Fedora Campbell, that property is one of two undeveloped lots located between the Jordans’ home and the Gulf.

Beachfront homeowners launch Preserve AMI campaign
FDEP is expected to rule this week as to whether the vacant lot seaward of the Jordans’ beachfront home can be developed. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

On Feb. 13, 2020, an application was submitted to FDEP on Campbell’s behalf seeking to construct a single-family residence on her property. On June 25, 2020, FDEP provided Campbell and her associates with a notice to proceed and a permit for construction or other activities. The FDEP notice stated those whose substantial interests may be affected by the department’s action could petition for a formal administrative hearing.

On Aug. 3, 2020, attorney David Levin filed a petition for a formal administrative hearing with the Florida Department of Administrative Hearings (DOAH). Levin filed that document on behalf of petitioners David Morris and Ling Liu (owners of 108 Elm Ave.), DAR Real Estate Enterprises LLC (owners of 109 Sycamore Ave.) and Richard Theidel (owner of 100 Sycamore Ave.).

“On or about June 25, 2020, petitioners became aware that permit number ME-1341 had been issued to a neighbor authorizing the construction of a new single-family residence at 105 Elm Ave.,” according to the petition for hearing document that named Campbell and FDEP as respondents.

“The structure authorized by FDEP’s CCCL (Coastal Construction Control Line) permit will substantially advance seaward the established line of existing construction. By way of example, immediately adjacent and to the east of Campbell’s proposed residential structure is a single-family residential structure at 107 Elm Ave. Said residence was authorized by FDEP permit number ME-919 to be constructed to the existing line of construction. According to the CCCL plan submitted with Campbell’s application, the residence at 107 Elm Ave., and hence the established line of existing construction, is 270 feet and 249 feet seaward of the CCCL, north and south respectively. Petitioners specifically allege that as presently designed and authorized by Permit No. ME-1341, Campbell’s proposed structures do not comply with the applicable requirements and are not eligible for a CCCL permit. Petitioners seek a final order revoking Permit No. ME-1341,” according to the petition for hearing.

Recommended order

In response to the petitioners’ request, administrative law judge Francine Ffolkes presided over a DOAH hearing that occurred during six days this past February.

According to the DOAH website, Ffolkes was assigned to DOAH’s environmental and specialization districts in 2017. Before that, she served as deputy general counsel in charge of FDEP’s litigation section.

Beachfront homeowners launch Preserve AMI campaign
In June, DOAH administrative law judge Francine Ffolkes issued an order recommending that FDEP grant Fedora Campbell’s development request. – DOAH | Submitted

On June 7, Ffolkes issued her recommended order regarding the FDEP permit issued for 105 Elm Ave.

“Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is hereby recommended that DEP enter a final order granting respondent Campbell’s application for a CCCL permit to construct a single-family residence and associated structures seaward of the CCCL,” Ffolkes stated in her written recommended order.

On June 29, Wendy Jordan sent a lengthy email to Anna Maria Mayor Dan Murphy and all five city commissioners in which she stated, “We learned before closing that our property was involved in litigation between several contiguous waterfront neighbors. We gladly joined the fight. We first offered the lot owner $2 million for her lot. She asked for $2 million and we met to set the closing and then she turned it down.”

Regarding Ffolkes’ recommended order, Jordan’s email noted petitioners had 15 days to respond to what she referred to as “the unbelievable ruling.”

Jordan’s email also said, “For those who immediately say, ‘You are only worried about your view,’ of course I am worried about my view. We paid for a view and it is in jeopardy of change that will ruin the wildlife.”

When contacted on Thursday, July 15, an assistant in Ffolkes’ office who wished to remain anonymous said FDEP can follow, modify or discard the judge’s recommended order, and she wasn’t aware of a final order being issued.

On Friday, July 16, The Sun received an email response from FDEP Press Secretary Alexandra Kuchta that said, “The department will issue a final order in this case on or before July 22.”

City permits also needed

If permitted by FDEP, the development of 105 Elm would also require building permits issued by the city of Anna Maria.

On July 6, Anna Maria Building Official Luke Curtis sent an email to Murphy regarding that property.

Curtis’ email referenced a determination of buildable area report for 105 Elm that the Environmental, Consulting & Technology (ECT) firm provided the city in February 2018, before the current dispute ensued.

His email noted the ECT report said, “This buildable area determination should only be considered a preliminary determination to ensure consistency with the city’s zoning regulations, but the extent of development on this lot will ultimately be decided by FDEP.”

Curtis’ email noted the ECT report said, “The parcel was previously situated much closer to the Gulf of Mexico relative to its current position. The significant transition in the beach profile is due to beach renourishment projects that were initiated in 2002 in an effort to remediate major erosion along the shoreline. FDEP will need to evaluate whether the lot would be considered primary dunes which are subject to more restrictions.”

Curtis’ email states the buildable area determinations provided by ECT – and a separate report provided by the ECO consulting group in 2017 – both confirm 105 Elm is a buildable lot per city code.

Beachfront homeowners launch Preserve AMI campaign
Elm Avenue ends near the Jordans’ driveway and does not currently provided direct access to 105 Elm. – Joe Hendricks | Sun

Elm Avenue currently ends near the Jordans’ driveway and does not provide direct access to 105 Elm Ave.

“Prior to any building permit being accepted by the building department, a development permit, along with a site plan – including but not limited to access to the property, sewer, water and electric utilities – will need to be considered and approved by the city commission,” Curtis noted in his email.

County says Piney Point crisis is “under control”

County says Piney Point crisis is “under control”

PALMETTO – County and state officials believe they now have the Piney Point crisis under control.

During today’s 4 p.m. press conference, acting County Administrator Scott Hopes said, “This has been short-lived. We have dramatically reduced the risk in a very controlled way, so that, hopefully, all of us have time to recover both physically and emotionally. I think everybody should rest assured that this is very much under control now. The risk has been lessened to the point that people will be able to return to their homes. Well water (and) drinking water is safe. The environment is being protected as much as possible.”

Manatee Public Safety Director Jake Saur said the Piney Point evacuation order has been lifted and residents and business owners and operators are now allowed to return to their homes and businesses. US-41 is open but a stretch of Buckeye Road remains closed.

According to Saur, the breached pond currently contains approximately 59 feet of water. More than 20 pumps are being used to continue siphoning approximately 33-34 million gallons a day of water from the breached containment pond continue to be pumped into Tampa Bay.

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) is taking frequent water quality samples at the Piney Point site, at Port Manatee and in the waters beyond the port. Water quality sample results can be found online.

Kevin Guthrie, the deputy director of the Florida Division of Emergency Management said a submersible will be brought in Wednesday to survey and hopefully repair the tear or tears in the liner of the breached retention pond.

Earlier today, during the Manatee County Commission meeting, Hopes said there has been no second breach of the containment pond. He said the thermal imaging previously detected by aerial drones and thought to be another potential breach in the containment wall, proved to be plant material rather than water seeping through a tear into the containment wall. Hopes said approximately 300 million gallons of water remained in the breached containment pond as of this morning.

During today’s meeting, county commissioners unanimously approved using deep well injection to remove any remaining water from the breached pond and also from the more polluted water contained in two additional Piney Point retention ponds that have not been breached. According to County Commission Chairwoman Vanessa Baugh, the water will be treated to the county’s standards before it is injected deep into the ground using a deep injection well to be located on a nearby county-owned property.

FDEP Secretary Noah Valenstein said the permitting, engineering and design work for a deep injection well typically takes two to three years before the actual injection process begins.

State and federal funds are expected to be provided to cover or help cover the significant cost of the deep well injection process.

In closing Hopes said he did not anticipate the county holding any additional press conferences on the Piney Point situation.

FDEP and FDEM officials and are expected to remain at the Piney Point site for the foreseeable future.

Related coverage

Second breach found at Piney Point

Additional leaks suspected at Piney Point